Tom Lane wrote:
> Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook
> than is installed at postgresql.org ...)
I think the only thing that could affect this is the version of
jade/openjade. Certainly not the stylesheet version.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.or
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > I see the current snapshot tarball has manual pages from 7.4. When
> > and who will make them for 8.0?
>
> I will, as soon as we have a solution for the problem described here:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2004-10/msg00018.php
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:11:17PM -0800, Harry wrote:
>> http://www.hjackson.org/blog/archives/2004/12/postgresql_data.html
> Huh, this sounds like transaction Id wraparound to me.
Given the mention of a drive glitch, I'm mentally comparing it to our
Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In hindsight I would have done some things differently, like posting to
> one of the lists. If you think that it would be better for people to
> ask the list and run from there then I will leave it.
Well, we should certainly encourage people to post such problem
--- Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Is there any material online on how to recover a corrupt postgresql
> > database?
>
> There are dozens if not hundreds of case histories in the mailing
> list archives; the latest example is this thread:
> http://archi
--- Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://www.hjackson.org/blog/archives/2004/12/postgresql_data.html
>
> Huh, this sounds like transaction Id wraparound to me. Do you
> regularly run vacuums on the whole database? Did you ask for expert
> help on the lists before running to do w
Harry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any material online on how to recover a corrupt postgresql
> database?
There are dozens if not hundreds of case histories in the mailing list
archives; the latest example is this thread:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-12/msg00479.php
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:11:17PM -0800, Harry wrote:
> I have just had a bit of a disaster with a database and found very
> little material online about how to recover from a corrupted database.
> This is not the first time I have had to recoover data from a postgres
> database which was caused e
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
>> stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:
>>
>> $ rpm -qa|grep docbook
>> docbook-dtds-1.0-25
>> doc
I have just had a bit of a disaster with a database and found very
little material online about how to recover from a corrupted database.
This is not the first time I have had to recoover data from a postgres
database which was caused either by some hardware failure or my own
error (not sure which
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 12:36:55PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
> stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:
>
> $ rpm -qa|grep docbook
> docbook-dtds-1.0-25
> docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
Peter announced just the o
Hmmm ... good point - configure thinks I am running 4.2, but the
stylesheets etc might be more recent than postgresql.org's:
$ rpm -qa|grep docbook
docbook-dtds-1.0-25
docbook-style-dsssl-1.78-4
Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am seeing a docs build failure :
F
Mark Kirkwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am seeing a docs build failure :
Fixed, thanks. (You must be running a pickier version of docbook
than is installed at postgresql.org ...)
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
I am seeing a docs build failure :
openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1646:10:E: end tag for "SECT3" omitted, but
OMITTAG NO was specified
openjade:plpgsql.sgml:1640:5: start tag was here
make: *** [html] Error 1
Adding an extra tag after line 1645 will make it build ok on my
system (not sure if that was th
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I see the current snapshot tarball has manual pages from 7.4. When
> and who will make them for 8.0?
I will, as soon as we have a solution for the problem described here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2004-10/msg00018.php
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.
I see the current snapshot tarball has manual pages from 7.4. When and
who will make them for 8.0?
--
Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be
16 matches
Mail list logo