Re: [DOCS] [GENERAL] Windows 2000 Slower Than Windows XP (SOLVED)

2005-01-23 Thread Lincoln Yeoh
While not an FAQ (yet?) I find it interesting that installing a QoS packet scheduler would _improve_ response - (I'm assuming there's no other concurrent traffic other than DB traffic). Anyone know why this would be the case or have any ideas? Might it improve performance for other network soft

Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] [BUGS] BUG #1414: DOC - pl/Perl hash tags

2005-01-23 Thread Dave Page
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alexey Borzov > Sent: 20 January 2005 21:29 > To: Magnus Hagander > Cc: Tom Lane; Mike Blackwell; pgsql-docs@postgresql.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] [BUGS] BUG #1414: D

Re: [DOCS] FAQ 4.15 misleading about uniqueness of OIDs

2005-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
Michael Fuhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > FAQ 4.15 "What is an OID? What is a TID?" is misleading about the > uniqueness of OIDs. It does mention the possibility of overflow > (while mentioning that nobody has ever reported it), The latter claim is surely obsolete, anyway.

[DOCS] FAQ 4.15 misleading about uniqueness of OIDs

2005-01-23 Thread Michael Fuhr
FAQ 4.15 "What is an OID? What is a TID?" is misleading about the uniqueness of OIDs. It does mention the possibility of overflow (while mentioning that nobody has ever reported it), but it doesn't discourage their use as primary keys like the documentation does in, for example, the following sect

Re: [DOCS] A Question

2005-01-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 03:31:39PM +, neo anderson wrote: > Hi, thanks for all your reply. > I originally planned to translate the manual of the > postgresql > [http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/index.html]. > Though seemly there's translation already [of my > native language], but it's

Re: [DOCS] Link to 8.0 documentation

2005-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (elein) writes: > From the website, the link to the > documentation is at: > http://borg.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/ > This is a different form than it used to be, iirc. > It used to use "current". AFAICT the scheme hasn't changed: both of these forms still work: http://www

[DOCS] Link to 8.0 documentation

2005-01-23 Thread elein
>From the website, the link to the documentation is at: http://borg.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/ This is a different form than it used to be, iirc. It used to use "current". Are we expecting to use this form going forward or are the docs going to be moved to an URL not containing the release nu

Re: [pgsql-www] [DOCS] Doc tarball should include manual pages?

2005-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > Should the doc tarball contain the manual pages? Right now it does not. > > It only has the SGML files in HTML. > > What? The man pages are in man.tar.gz. Right, but the *doc* tarball (postgresql-docs-8.0.0.tar.bz2) doesn't have that file, only the f

Re: [DOCS] Doc tarball should include manual pages?

2005-01-23 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > Should the doc tarball contain the manual pages? Right now it does not. > It only has the SGML files in HTML. What? The man pages are in man.tar.gz. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 8

[DOCS] Doc tarball should include manual pages?

2005-01-23 Thread Bruce Momjian
Should the doc tarball contain the manual pages? Right now it does not. It only has the SGML files in HTML. -- Bruce Momjian| http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road +

Re: [DOCS] A Question

2005-01-23 Thread neo anderson
Hi, thanks for all your reply. I originally planned to translate the manual of the postgresql [http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.0/static/index.html]. Though seemly there's translation already [of my native language], but it's out of dated [and I still get no reply before I post this message]. There

Re: [DOCS] [GENERAL] Windows 2000 Slower Than Windows XP (SOLVED)

2005-01-23 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 10:25:30PM -0600, Quinton Lawson wrote: > By default, Windows XP installs the QoS Packet Scheduler service. It > is not installed by default on Windows 2000. After I installed QoS > Packet Scheduler on the Windows 2000 machine, the latency problem > vanished. Maybe this