Re: [DOCS] Two points about docs

2005-05-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Vladimir Chukharev wrote: > On Sun, 08 May 2005 06:18:04 +0300, Bruce Momjian > wrote: > > > I have added your first two suggestions. Not sure where to put the > > large object links in the function section. It seems out of place there > > to me. > > Thanks! > > About the link to the lo_* f

Re: [DOCS] Using Encryption Patch to Docs

2005-05-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
I have reworded some of the encryption sections in this patch and applied the changes: http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml/encryption-approaches.html I moved the section up a few sections, changes the markup a little, and removed the encryption FAQ item now that we have a c

[DOCS] [patch] Typo in ECPG Docs

2005-05-09 Thread Andreas Seltenreich
Hi, I just stumbled across a spurious indefinite article in the ECPG docs. See the attached patch. Speaking of indefinite articles, there seems to be some inconsistency in using "a SQL ..." and "an SQL ..." throughout the docs. This could probably be easily fixed using a script, but I'm not sure