> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
>> Backup".
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard
> terminology AFAIK.
There's something ambiguous about it, in view that there are two
useful points in time for a b
Hi there,
How can i send mail form postgresql.
any suggestion.
thanx & regards
aftab
"Andrew Dunstan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark said:
> > Well fwiw what pg_dump does isn't even considered a "backup" at all in
> > other systems. It's a "logical export" or something of that sort.
> >
> > It's not considered a "backup" because it's saving something different
> > than
Bruce Momjian writes:
> I noticed that we are using the term "Online Backup" in our
> documentation when we are talking about continuous backup and PITR.
>
> To me, "online backup" is doing a backup while the system is online
> (online-backup), and that is accomplished by pg_dump.
Well fwiw w
On Mon, 26 Dec 2005, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
I have never heard the term Continuous backup. Although I have heard
online backup. The problem is that when I hear the term online backup
I think Hot backup which is what we do with pg_dump.
Yes, that is my problem too.
I wo
On Mon, 2005-12-26 at 13:46 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian writes:
> > > I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
> > > Backup".
> >
> > This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard
> > terminology AFAIK.
>
> B