Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well, I assumed Tom was referring to placement in the source tree, i.e.
> {prefix} is contrib/dblink, etc.
I'm concerned about both location in the source tree (dblink and
tsearch2 are inconsistent) and location in the installation tree.
The former seems e
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:04:50PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > Maybe it's just me, but I find it annoying that the ALTER TABLE docs
> > > say to look at the CREATE TABLE docs for info on CONSTRAINT syntax. ISTM
> > > it would be much better to:
>
Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:20:38PM -0800, Joe Conway wrote:
Well I like {prefix}/doc given that's how dblink is already set up ;-)
By {prefix} do you mean where PostgreSQL is being installed? If so, that
would be highly non-standard. I think what you'd want is
{prefix}/sh
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 04:20:38PM -0800, Joe Conway wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> >Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>Tom Lane wrote:
> >>
> >>>It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
> >>>Makefiles don't install them either.
> >>>
> >>>It'd be a good idea to settle
On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:04:50PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > Maybe it's just me, but I find it annoying that the ALTER TABLE docs
> > say to look at the CREATE TABLE docs for info on CONSTRAINT syntax. ISTM
> > it would be much better to:
> >
> > Include the docs in bot
Tom Lane wrote:
Joe Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
It's not only the downstream packagers that have missed these: the
Makefiles don't install them either.
It'd be a good idea to settle on what we want the installed file layout
to be --- do we need to create subdirectories
