Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Tom Lane
Scott Marlowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yeah, I keep thinking more and more we need a LOT of linkable resources > for this, much like the ones we have for all the standard command > reference stuff. I'm leaning towards having the main page of each of > these things be somewhat closer to an exe

Re: [DOCS] [PATCHES] Example for UPDATE FROM with correllation

2006-01-19 Thread Bruce Momjian
Patch applied, with minor space adjustments to HEAD and 8.1.X. I also noticed a few earlier examples were missing paragraph formatting. --- David Fetter wrote: > Folks, > > Please find enclosed a doc patch that adds an exa

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:15:19AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > I agree completely. We don't probably need it in sgml just yet. From a Actually, I was looking for how to get the view out of the existing SGML ;) In any case, I think admin is probably broad enough that there won't be much overlap

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Jim C. Nasby
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 06:00:36PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2006 02:31 schrieb Jim C. Nasby: > > Is there an easy way to get a 2-level outline out of the sgml? > > How would you define the TOC that we currently produce? Sorry, I guess what I was actually thinking

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 16:00, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 10:15:19AM -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote: > > I agree completely. We don't probably need it in sgml just yet. From a > > Actually, I was looking for how to get the view out of the existing SGML > ;) In any case, I think admi

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Am Donnerstag, 19. Januar 2006 02:31 schrieb Jim C. Nasby: > Is there an easy way to get a 2-level outline out of the sgml? How would you define the TOC that we currently produce? -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/ ---(end of broadcast)-

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Scott Marlowe
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 19:31, Jim C. Nasby wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:19:16PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Jim C. Nasby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'm wondering if people feel this is an issue with the docs in general > > > and isn't limited to just the admin stuff? > > > > Probably

Re: [DOCS] vacuum and routine maintenance docs

2006-01-19 Thread Neil Conway
On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 17:24 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Why is Managing Database and Routine Database Management separate? I assume you mean the "Managing Databases" and "Routine Database Maintenance Tasks" chapters. I think these chapters are separate because they address fairly different sub