On Mon, 2006-03-20 at 17:12, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
> > three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
> > slightly more helpful for each.
>
> No particular opin
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What about the larger suggested change of breaking that section into
> three more granular subsections? I could see commentary being
> slightly more helpful for each.
No particular opinion from here.
Someone (was it Scott Marlowe?) recently
On Mar 20, 2006, at 4:48 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
A base backup taken from a running postmaster will still include a
postmaster.pid file, which will prevent a new postmaster from being
able to be started.
Usually not; only if the PID mentioned in
"Thomas F. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A base backup taken from a running postmaster will still include a
> postmaster.pid file, which will prevent a new postmaster from being
> able to be started.
Usually not; only if the PID mentioned in the file belongs to an
existing process b
I just completed my first online backup and recovery cycle in a test
environment.
I encountered a minor hiccup at step 8 of the process outlined in the
docs in 23.3.3, "Recovering with an On-line Backup":
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/backup-online.html#BACKUP-
PITR-RECOVERY
