On Monday 21 August 2006 09:47, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> Hi,
>
> has there been a consensus about where a replication document should go
> and what it should cover?
>
I think the general idea is to toss it on techdocs... like the GUI Tools
page... http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.54
-
David Fetter wrote:
> I think it's useful to mention what's arriving, what's being worked
> on, and what's not even being contemplated in the long term.
We don't even have a roadmap of any kind, so the last thing we can do is
put claims of that sort in the documentation.
> Similar troubles apply
