Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There's still one very minor thing:
Updated, thanks for the suggestions.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Are you looking at CVS HEAD, or what was there in beta1? I rewrote
> that stuff a few days ago:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/textsearch-indexes.html
>
Excellent, thanks, that's a big improvement to those docs all around. I
Hello,
I am sure we are all long bored with this thread (on both sides) so I
thought I would offer a compromise. When dealing with long documents it
is quite common to see something like this:
PostgreSQL hereafter referred to as Postgres
I propose that we could have the FAQ and the Docs do the s
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The Tsearch docs, under the GiST and GIN section, say:
> "Lossiness [of GiST] causes serious performance degradation since random
> access of heap records is slow and limits the usefulness of GiST
> indexes."
> The docs do go into some detail, but I think i
[ BCC to docs.]
FYI, since no one liked my second-in-paragraph usage of "Postgres" in
the FAQ and developer's FAQ, I have removed it.
---
bruce wrote:
> [ BCC to docs because this might affect documentation too.]
>
> You pr
The Tsearch docs, under the GiST and GIN section, say:
"Lossiness [of GiST] causes serious performance degradation since random
access of heap records is slow and limits the usefulness of GiST
indexes."
The docs do go into some detail, but I think it causes some confusion,
also.
Let me digress t