Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > The point is that there is a lot of replication information I don't want
> > to merge into that SGML page so even if we mention "Londiste", the wiki
> > reference is still useful. I have the same problem with mentioning
> > pooling in the docs --- there is no natura
Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes:
> On 05/27/2010 01:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Is anybody maintaining
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
>> ?
>>
>> For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying
>> build fails, which makes it approximately completely
On 05/27/2010 04:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Francisco Reyes wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level th
On 05/27/2010 01:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Is anybody maintaining
http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
?
For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying
build fails, which makes it approximately completely useless. A more
cosmetic but still annoying pro
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Is anybody maintaining
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html
> ?
>
> For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying
> build fails, which makes it approximately completely useless. A more
> cosmetic