Re: [DOCS] Londiste

2010-05-27 Thread Bruce Momjian
Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote: > > The point is that there is a lot of replication information I don't want > > to merge into that SGML page so even if we mention "Londiste", the wiki > > reference is still useful. I have the same problem with mentioning > > pooling in the docs --- there is no natura

Re: [DOCS] documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile

2010-05-27 Thread Tom Lane
Stefan Kaltenbrunner writes: > On 05/27/2010 01:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Is anybody maintaining >> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html >> ? >> >> For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying >> build fails, which makes it approximately completely

Re: [DOCS] Londiste

2010-05-27 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
On 05/27/2010 04:22 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: Francisco Reyes wrote: Bruce Momjian writes: Well, I assumed "Londiste" head reached the level th

Re: [DOCS] documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile

2010-05-27 Thread Stefan Kaltenbrunner
On 05/27/2010 01:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Is anybody maintaining http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html ? For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying build fails, which makes it approximately completely useless. A more cosmetic but still annoying pro

Re: [DOCS] documentation build log is busted, and has been for awhile

2010-05-27 Thread Dave Page
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Is anybody maintaining > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/buildlog.html > ? > > For some time now, that page has failed to update if the underlying > build fails, which makes it approximately completely useless.  A more > cosmetic