On 30 August 2010 14:41, Thom Brown wrote:
> Any opinion on the first patch I provided at the beginning of this thread?
It appears that first email never made it through. Since it may be
because of the size of the patch, I reattach it but gzipped. Here's
the original message too:
I attach a pa
On 6 September 2010 15:54, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> Anymore feedback/suggestions? Anything not look right? Are we there
>> yet?
>
> The only thing I found a little distracting with the current layout
> is that on some pages the horizontal lines for the section and
> subsecti
Thom Brown wrote:
> Anymore feedback/suggestions? Anything not look right? Are we there
> yet?
The only thing I found a little distracting with the current layout
is that on some pages the horizontal lines for the section and
subsection are very close together. If the lines for subsections
we
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 14:45, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 1 September 2010 21:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:39:54 -0400 2010:
>>> On 1 September 2010 21:34, Alvaro Herrera
>>> wrote:
>>> > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:22:22 -0
On 1 September 2010 21:46, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:39:54 -0400 2010:
>> On 1 September 2010 21:34, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> > Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:22:22 -0400 2010:
>> >
>> >> I'm coming round to the idea that if w
