Robert Haas writes:
> Hmm. I'm inclined to just remove that sentence. The fact that you
> can make the operation fail by pointing it at someplace where there's
> not a server listening doesn't really seem to merit a disclaimer. I
> think waiting IS a well-defined operation now; it just won't su
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> At least the reference to section 31.14 is needless since password
>>> authentication doesn't affect the pg_ctl -w for now. But, on the second
>>> thought, it can still fail because of mi
