Looking at our ref pages, I see some manual pages specify long options
that take arguments using '=', e.g. initdb.sgml:
--long-opt=opt
and some do not, e.g. pg_dump.sgml:
--long-opt opt
So, which should we use, for consistency?
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
E
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I have applied an updated patch
FWIW, that looks good to me.
-Kevin
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" writes:
> > Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> A private email I received indicated that our documentation about
> >> ignoring trailing spaces in CHAR() comparisons was slightly
> >> inaccurate. I have update our docs to indicate it is only
> >> non-pattern comparisons
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> > A private email I received indicated that our documentation about
> > ignoring trailing spaces in CHAR() comparisons was slightly
> > inaccurate. I have update our docs to indicate it is only
> > non-pattern comparisons that ignore spaces with
"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> A private email I received indicated that our documentation about
>> ignoring trailing spaces in CHAR() comparisons was slightly
>> inaccurate. I have update our docs to indicate it is only
>> non-pattern comparisons that ignore spaces with CHAR
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> A private email I received indicated that our documentation about
> ignoring trailing spaces in CHAR() comparisons was slightly
> inaccurate. I have update our docs to indicate it is only
> non-pattern comparisons that ignore spaces with CHAR(). Applied
> doc patch attac
A private email I received indicated that our documentation about
ignoring trailing spaces in CHAR() comparisons was slightly inaccurate.
I have update our docs to indicate it is only non-pattern comparisons
that ignore spaces with CHAR(). Applied doc patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian
On 8 March 2011 01:08, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:31:18PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>> > Re: docs, I'd actually like to see that list gone, as the separation
>> > of docs from code is one that's actively unhelpful. We d