Robert Haas writes:
> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Uh, is that actually a true statement? I thought the result *did*
>> include default values. That's more or less the point of returning them
>> all, after all.
> Well, then I'm confused, because you and Dmitriy seem to
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Slightly updated patch attached.
>
> Looks good.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas writes:
>> Maybe we should change this:
>
>> Note that only options explicitly specified in the string will have
>> values set in the result array; no defaults are inserted.
>
>> To say something like this:
>
>> All legal options wil
