Re: [DOCS] Add link to current_schemas in config.sgml

2011-06-13 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 14 June 2011 02:39, Robert Haas wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Brendan Jurd wrote: >> This is just a quick docs patch to add a link to the mention of the >> current_schemas function from 18.10.1. Statement Behavior. > > Your patch got mangled by my email cl

Re: [DOCS] Add link to current_schemas in config.sgml

2011-06-13 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 14 June 2011 02:58, Robert Haas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Brendan Jurd wrote: >> On 14 June 2011 02:39, Robert Haas wrote: >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:27 AM, Brendan Jurd wrote: >>>> This is just a quick docs patch to add a link to the menti

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] DOCS: SGML identifier may not exceed 44 characters

2011-05-31 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 1 June 2011 06:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > It looks like the original DocBook distribution has a limit of 44, but > someone patched it to 256 on your installation. > > But it seems like no one else has seen this problem yet, so it's quite > suspicious, since surely people have built the docum

[DOCS] DOCS: SGML identifier may not exceed 44 characters

2011-05-30 Thread Brendan Jurd
Hi folks, I was working on a little docs patch today, and when I tried to `make`, openjade choked on an identifier in information_schema.sgml, which is very much unrelated to my changes: openjade:information_schema.sgml:828:60:Q: length of name token must not exceed NAMELEN (44) Here is a trivia

[DOCS] Add link to current_schemas in config.sgml

2011-05-30 Thread Brendan Jurd
Hi folks, This is just a quick docs patch to add a link to the mention of the current_schemas function from 18.10.1. Statement Behavior. The function must be called with one boolean argument, the meaning of which isn't clear until you read the description in 9.23. I also removed the parentheses

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

2010-10-14 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 15 October 2010 05:33, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 02:24 +1100, Brendan Jurd wrote: >> I'll drop this onto the next open commitfest.  If it passes muster, it >> sure wouldn't hurt to backpatch it to 9.0. > > Committed. Not sure there's anyt

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

2010-10-14 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 12 October 2010 23:28, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Brendan Jurd wrote: >> I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part, >> the docs were excellent.  The one exception for me was the discussion >> of archive_cleanup_comma

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

2010-10-14 Thread Brendan Jurd
On 14 October 2010 08:45, Robert Haas wrote: > Is someone working on a patch? Yes, I will prepare a patch to get us started. Cheers, BJ -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

[DOCS] Docs for archive_cleanup_command are poor

2010-10-08 Thread Brendan Jurd
Hi folks, I have just set up HS+SR for the first time, and for the most part, the docs were excellent. The one exception for me was the discussion of archive_cleanup_command. This is a pretty important part of constructing a healthy standby server, and IMO the docs don't give it the treatment it