http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-table-expressions.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-select.html
Respectively:
"Finally, NATURAL is a shorthand form of USING: it forms a USING list
consisting of all column names that appear in both input tables. As
with USING, th
2011/5/18 Grzegorz Szpetkowski :
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-table-expressions.html
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-select.html
>
> Respectively:
>
> "Finally, NATURAL is a shorthand form of USING: it forms a USING list
> consistin
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-table-expressions.html
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-select.html
Respectively:
"Finally, NATURAL is a shorthand form of USING: it forms a USING list
consisting of all column names that appear in both input tables. As
with USING, th
nable join conditions
I mean add something like: "Note that you can't use such conditions
with FULL JOIN, only equality of selected columns is supported with
this type".
Thanks,
Grzegorz Szpetkowski
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/queries-overview.html
"Assuming that there is a table called table1, this command would
retrieve all rows and all columns from table1."
Maybe it's worth adding:
"Assuming that there is a table called table1, this command would
retrieve all rows and all c
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-altertable.html
"To add a foreign key constraint to a table:
ALTER TABLE distributors ADD CONSTRAINT distfk FOREIGN KEY (address)
REFERENCES addresses (address) MATCH FULL;"
This looks confusing to me. Is "MATCH FULL" works with non-composite
(one ad
then the effect is the same as if
no
were specified."
I found that in SQL:2003 draft, so in above case MATCH FULL is
syntactically ok, but rather confusing and effectively do nothing
(maybe just impression purpose).
Regards,
G. Sz.
2011/5/9 Grzegorz Szpetkowski :
> http://www.postgresql
,
product_no integer REFERENCES products (product_no) NOT NULL,
quantity integer
);
Regards,
Grzegorz Szpetkowski
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
not
belong to "(any other)" group as:
SELECT 5 ! + 6;
ERROR: operator does not exist: integer ! integer
LINE 1: SELECT 5 ! + 6;
Regards,
Grzegorz Szpetkowski
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
"user"
LINE 1: ALTER ROLE user CREATEDB;
^
postgres=# ALTER ROLE "user" CREATEDB;
ALTER ROLE
Regards,
Grzegorz Szpetkowski
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs
ion, 0 gives no
compression at all (the input data is simply copied a block at a
time). Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION requests a default compromise between
speed and compression (currently equivalent to level 6)."
#define Z_DEFAULT_COMPRESSION (-1) (zlib.h)
What do you think about adding some clarification in Postgr
11 matches
Mail list logo