Re: [DOCS] Underscorces in copy-documentation (9.0 and higher)

2013/3/20 Tom Lane > As Ian notes, that's the old syntax with a hard-wired option set. > The lack of parentheses after WITH is the difference. Aarfh, thanks, guys! -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/ma

Fwd: [DOCS] Underscorces in copy-documentation (9.0 and higher)

or FORCEQUOTE won't (e.g. on a "PostgreSQL 9.2.3 on i386-portbld-freebsd9.1, compiled by cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]"). Best regards, Mario -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-docs

[DOCS] Underscorces in copy-documentation (9.0 and higher)

Hi, - http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/sql-copy.html, - http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.1/static/sql-copy.html and - http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/sql-copy.html have underscores ("_") where there should be none, e.g. in "FORCE_QUOTES". Best regards,

Re: [DOCS] Array functions not mentioned in Index

Tom Lane wrote: Mario Splivalo writes: Hope this is ok. How can I submit patch for 8.3 documentation? I think you just did. Applied, thanks. I pulled the source from CVS HEAD branch, I see that is 8.4 documentation (for instance, 'cardinality' function is nonexistant for 8

Re: [DOCS] Array functions not mentioned in Index

Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Mario Splivalo wrote: >> None of the array functions >> (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) >> are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? >> I thought it would be 'handy' to hav

Re: [DOCS] Array functions not mentioned in Index

Alvaro Herrera wrote: Mario Splivalo wrote: None of the array functions (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index

[DOCS] Array functions not mentioned in Index

None of the array functions (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-array.html) are mentioned in the documentation index. Is that intentional? I thought it would be 'handy' to have those functions referenced in index. Mike -- Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs

Re: [DOCS] [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

On 29/08/2007, Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder if it would be possible to keep the master version of the > contrib docs as SGML, and generate plaintext READMEs from it during the > documentation build. > Hello Neil, I think I'm doing something similar but not with README file

Re: [DOCS] Volunteer to build a configuration tool

On 18/06/07, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mario, The JavaScript configuration tool I proposed would not be in the install of PostgreSQL. It would be an HTML page. It would be part of the HTML documentation or it could be a separate HTML page that would be linked from th

Re: [DOCS] Volunteer to build a configuration tool

On 18/06/07, Campbell, Lance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Next the person would press a button, "generate", found below the questions. The JavaScript HTML page would then generate content for two Iframes at the bottom on the page. One Iframe would contain the contents of the postgresql.conf file

[DOCS] 'FOUND' keyword not found in index (pg8.2)

x27; keyword should be enlisted in Index? Mario ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [DOCS] Switching to XML

On 08/12/06, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is a long standing support within the community to move to XML including: Josh Berkus Josh Drake Robert Treat Andrew Dunslane David Blewett David Fetter Devrim Gunduz Darcy Buskermolen And that is just from #postgresql And now in

Re: [DOCS] DocBook/XML summary

On 15/07/06, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > - Translation tools may work better with XML sources. (Totally > > unconfirmed; would need to be in actual use by someone.) > > Do you mean language translation or transformation (as in pdf?). Language translati

Re: [DOCS] French PDF manual

On 26/05/06, Guillaume Lelarge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/5/26, Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Am Freitag, 26. Mai 2006 14:19 schrieb Guillaume Lelarge: > > Yes, you're right. There's some changes to do on the documentation > > source files. I can provide a diff which will transform

Re: [DOCS] French PDF manual

or one. Sounds like you can use that today, if you want to; it's just one extra step. But would it really be helpful on the documentation? I see where .po works for a lot of short, independent error messages, but I don't see it being real useful for big manuscripts. Hello! my name is Mar

[DOCS] Format Documents

Hello, This is my first post here, greetings! Well, I'm very interesting to help to translate PostgreSQL documents but I've seen all documents are in SGML. So I've got a question, will you change this format some time to DocBook XML? ---(end of broadcast)--