On 1 August 2017 at 09:13, wrote:
> Wondering why PostgreSQL still uses the terms master and slave when there
> are other terms like primary/secondary that can be used in the same manner.
Another alternative I've seen in different fields is "manager" and "agent".
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailin
On 1 August 2017 at 12:30, wrote:
> Hi,
> I am going through PostgreSQL, for the first day. And it was great till
> now.
> One quick question/doubt regarding the function
> "justify_days(interval)"
>
> select justify_days(interval '365 days');
>
> this statement returns 1 year 5 days, whereas I
I think the documentation links for version 10 need attention.
The series of documentation text and links for the current releases
are 9.5, 9.6:
...
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/static/
so I would have expected the new batch of releases[1] to sim
On 18 January 2017 at 09:57, wrote:
> select
> (ST_AsLatLonText('POINT ('||(-76.6)||' '||(35.1)||')', 'DD°MM''SS.SSS&C'))
> dms
>
> returns unexpected 60 seconds
> 35° 6'0.000&N 76°35'60.000&W
This is not a PostgreSQL bug. PostGIS bugs go to https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis
See https://trac.osgeo
I'm not sure if this is worth documenting, but pg_dumping mixed-case tables
with the '-t table' option appears to not be accurately documented
for cmd.exe. Here are my four attempts, with only the last as success:
Intuitive (supplying "My Table" like "My Database"), but not correct:
C:\>"C:\Progra
See "latest releases" in the upper-left corner on http://www.postgresql.org/
9.0.1 · 2010-10-04 · Notes
8.4.5 · 2010-10-04 · Notes
8.3.12 · 2010-10-04 · Notes
8.2.18 · 2010-04-10 · Notes
8.1.22 · 2010-04-10 · Notes
The dates should follow a consistent Y-M-D formatting:
9.0.1 · 2010-10-04 · Notes
Hi,
While files are being renamed in the main repo, is it possible to
rename install-win32.sgml ? "win32" implies a 32-bit windows
architecture, which is dated and misleading.
Could I suggest:
git mv doc/src/sgml/install-win32.sgml doc/src/sgml/install-windows.sgml
and fix chapter_id references
On 22 June 2010 18:49, Tom Lane wrote:
> Thom Brown writes:
>> Is that the right behaviour though? Shouldn't the signed value reach
>> the cast step rather than the absolute value? Or maybe Postgres could
>> implicitly accept -12345::integer to be (-12345)::integer. Is there a
>> blocking reas
Greg Smith wrote:
The standard way to submit patches here is to attach a file with a
full context diff (diff -c) to the message, rather than putting it
inline or including just the changes. The idea is to make it easy for
the committers to grab your patch and apply it.
Part of my hesitation
Hi,
From a quick discussion on hackers
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-06/msg01434.php), it
appears the documentation can improve for pg_restore.
I've prepared some quick diff output from
pgsql/doc/src/sgml/ref/pg_restore.sgml for some changes that I think
would help. Not
10 matches
Mail list logo