Marc Cousin writes:
> From a technical point of view, I obviously totally agree, operators
> have no control over precedence, but I was only reporting this because
> I thought that it might be helpful to put something like a pointer to
> this table in the CREATE OPERATOR doc.
Oh, that's a reasona
The Thursday 08 July 2010 16:31:41, Tom Lane wrote :
> Marc Cousin writes:
> > I just got caught by a precedence problem with CREATE OPERATOR.
> >
> > Obviously, it was mostly my fault (I didn't think of the precedence of my
> > operator at all), but I didn't find anything in the CREATE OPERATOR
Marc Cousin writes:
> I just got caught by a precedence problem with CREATE OPERATOR.
> Obviously, it was mostly my fault (I didn't think of the precedence of my
> operator at all), but I didn't find anything in the CREATE OPERATOR
> documentation about it either.
CREATE OPERATOR has nothing t
Hi,
I just got caught by a precedence problem with CREATE OPERATOR.
Obviously, it was mostly my fault (I didn't think of the precedence of my
operator at all), but I didn't find anything in the CREATE OPERATOR
documentation about it either.
From looking at the code, I think I understood that i
