On tor, 2011-08-18 at 16:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I haven't actually tested whether we can build against 1.73.0, but that
> seems like a good place to start.
It turned out that 1.74.0 was the old version that works. Documented
that.
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pgsql-docs@postgresq
Thanks a lot for the info. I visited the docbook page, got the
latest style sheet and it worked fine.
--
Koichi Suzuki
2011/8/19 Tom Lane :
> I wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, there is no "bold" template in the 1.69.1 files,
>> though I do see it in the 1.76.1 files. So this looks to
I wrote:
> As far as I can tell, there is no "bold" template in the 1.69.1 files,
> though I do see it in the 1.76.1 files. So this looks to me like we
> have a minimum version dependency for docbook-style-xsl, and a
> relatively recent one at that (1.69 is six or so years old).
Some digging in t
Koichi Suzuki writes:
> I'm now trying to compile man? on CentOS 5.6 and it fails. Message
> says it cannot find templates "bold" and "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org".
I confirm that this fails on RHEL5.7, with docbook-style-xsl-1.69.1-5.1.
It works all right on my F14 box, with docbook-style-xsl-1.
Hi,
I'm now trying to compile man? on CentOS 5.6 and it fails. Message
says it cannot find templates "bold" and "pgsql-docs@postgresql.org".
I've specified stylesheet for docbook in configure. I was
successful to build other documents, html and pfd.
The same worked on Ubuntu 10.4.
Appreciat
