Awhile back I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut writes:
>> The questions for those who are building PDFs are
>> - Can you make the build work?
> * On RHEL 6: the available version of fop is 0.95, and it just fails
> completely. It looks like constructs cause a
> NullPointerException in some cases. I t
Hello Peter,
11.03.2017 05:25, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
The questions for those who are building PDFs are
- Can you make the build work?
- Does the output look OK?
Yes, we use FOP build to generate all the PDF's for current versions
(starting with 9.5).
Output looks ok, though we need to use e
Hello Alvaro,
11.03.2017 06:19, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
- Does the output look OK?
It looks generally sane in a very quick skim, modulo the problems we've
always had with PDFs, such as tables 9-44 and 9-45 being completely
unusable.
We at postgrespro added custom XSL (see pg-customize-fo.xsl in
p
Peter Eisentraut writes:
> As we are moving away from the old DSSSL toolchain, we also need to look
> into how we are building PDFs.
> The new way, using FOP, is called by
> make postgres-A4-fop.pdf postgres-US-fop.pdf
> The questions for those who are building PDFs are
> - Can you make the bu
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> The questions for those who are building PDFs are
>
> - Can you make the build work?
It worked fine for me after installing the "fop" package. No need to
rerun configure.
> - Does the output look OK?
It looks generally sane in a very quick skim, modulo the problems w
As we are moving away from the old DSSSL toolchain, we also need to look
into how we are building PDFs.
The old way, using jadetex, is called by
make postgres-A4.pdf postgres-US.pdf
The new way, using FOP, is called by
make postgres-A4-fop.pdf postgres-US-fop.pdf
This already exists.
