"Kevin Grittner" writes:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Yeah, I think that covers it well. :)
> I found a typo. :-( Another revision attached.
Applied to HEAD and 9.0, with a couple of trivial editorial adjustments.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-docs mailing list (pg
Thom Brown wrote:
> Yeah, I think that covers it well. :)
I found a typo. :-( Another revision attached.
-Kevin
*** a/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/ddl.sgml
***
*** 550,555 CREATE TABLE products (
--- 550,560
+ Adding a unique constraint
On 26 August 2010 20:16, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
>> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
>> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
>> it they only need to do
Thom Brown wrote:
> Looks good. Do we usually got into fine details such as the name
> of the index? They'll see the index name returned when they
> create the table or add the constraint anyway, and if they missed
> it they only need to do a "\dt tablename" to find out what it was.
Hmmm...
On 26 August 2010 18:50, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>
>>> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
>>> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
>>
>> Sure, go for it. :)
>
> Initial stab at it attached.
>
> I'm tor
Thom Brown wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> It looks like discussion died here. Do you want to propose a new
>> patch? (I'd be happy to give it a shot if you'd rather.)
>
> Sure, go for it. :)
Initial stab at it attached.
I'm torn on whether the paragraph I added to the foreign key
cons
On 25 August 2010 20:15, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>
I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section
of the Constraints page. While the informat
Thom Brown wrote:
> On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section
>>> of the Constraints page. While the information already exists
>>> on the CREATE TABLE, I don't th
On 18 August 2010 21:53, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
>> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
>> I attach a patch to add information to the
On ons, 2010-08-18 at 16:52 +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of the
> Constraints page. While
Thom Brown wrote:
> Well I guess the question is: "where will most people first look
> to find that piece of information out?"
The OP mentioned looking in the Indexes section of the documentation
for the answer.
> As long as the information isn't digressing from the topic it's
> mentioned in
On 18 August 2010 17:09, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Thom Brown wrote:
>
>> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary
>> keys
>>
> (http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
>> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of
>> th
Thom Brown wrote:
> In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary
> keys
>
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
> I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of
> the Constraints page. While the information already exists
In response to a user asking a question about indexes on primary keys
(http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2010-08/msg00194.php)
I attach a patch to add information to the Primary Keys section of the
Constraints page. While the information already exists on the CREATE
TABLE, I don't t
14 matches
Mail list logo
