Re: [DOCS] Tsearch docs question

2007-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There's still one very minor thing: Updated, thanks for the suggestions. regards, tom lane ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Re: [DOCS] Tsearch docs question

2007-10-26 Thread Jeff Davis
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:26 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Are you looking at CVS HEAD, or what was there in beta1? I rewrote > that stuff a few days ago: > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/textsearch-indexes.html > Excellent, thanks, that's a big improvement to those docs all around. I

Re: [DOCS] Tsearch docs question

2007-10-26 Thread Tom Lane
Jeff Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The Tsearch docs, under the GiST and GIN section, say: > "Lossiness [of GiST] causes serious performance degradation since random > access of heap records is slow and limits the usefulness of GiST > indexes." > The docs do go into some detail, but I think i

[DOCS] Tsearch docs question

2007-10-26 Thread Jeff Davis
The Tsearch docs, under the GiST and GIN section, say: "Lossiness [of GiST] causes serious performance degradation since random access of heap records is slow and limits the usefulness of GiST indexes." The docs do go into some detail, but I think it causes some confusion, also. Let me digress t