Re: [DOCS] regexp_replace 'g' flag

2014-01-31 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 09:59:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian writes: > > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 08:37:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > >> Why doesn't the 'g' flag appear in this table? > >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TAB

Re: [DOCS] regexp_replace 'g' flag

2013-09-06 Thread David Johnston
Sorry if you get this twice but I use Nabble and didn't subscribe to the list so my originals got put into the verification queue. I've subscribed now and am re-posting hoping it will go through clean. See my self-quote comment and my direct comment at the end. David Johnston wrote > > Tom La

Re: [DOCS] regexp_replace 'g' flag

2013-09-05 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian writes: > On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 08:37:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> Why doesn't the 'g' flag appear in this table? >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TABLE > Is it because the table has generic pattern modififers and '

Re: [DOCS] regexp_replace 'g' flag

2013-09-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 08:37:44PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Why doesn't the 'g' flag appear in this table? > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TABLE > > I see text here that says: > > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9

[DOCS] regexp_replace 'g' flag

2013-09-05 Thread Bruce Momjian
Why doesn't the 'g' flag appear in this table? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TABLE I see text here that says: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/static/functions-matching.html#FUNCTIONS-POSIX-REGEXP Other suppor