On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> I've shuffled around the Synchronous replication page, and made some
>>> changes to Streaming Replication, though the latter could probably use
>>> some further pruning. Could so
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I've shuffled around the Synchronous replication page, and made some
>> changes to Streaming Replication, though the latter could probably use
>> some further pruning. Could someone take a look at the small
>> documentation patch?
>
> Was
On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
>
>> The Streaming Replication wiki page[1] contains similar out-of-date
>> claims[2]; I can fix some of the egregious errors myself, though help
>> is welcome. The "Synchronous Repli
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> The Streaming Replication wiki page[1] contains similar out-of-date
> claims[2]; I can fix some of the egregious errors myself, though help
> is welcome. The "Synchronous Replication" wiki page[3] is in even
> worse shape, containing mostl
I think there is at least[4] one confusing documentation leftover from
the 9.0 days at:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/warm-standby.html
First, we claim:
| Streaming replication is asynchronous, so there is still a small delay
| between committing a transaction in the primary and f
