On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 16:00:31 +1200
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> a SJW agenda.
> the angry militant left.
Some people just can't stop themselves.
Which is a big reason for CoCs.
SteveT
Steve Litt
September 2018 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own Business
I need a mechanism of "logical locking" more ductile than the
pg_advisory family.
I'm thinking of a table ("lock_table") that would be part of the
database, with columns
* tablename varchar - name of the table "locked"
* rowid integer, - id of the row "locked"
* ownerid varchar, - identifier of
Dear All,
If we allow friendship and fellowship to flourish everyone benefits. That
doesn't mean we should drop our standards or quality.
It is worth remembering that all human beings are social animals(basic logic)
so even the most logical person could get offended and turn off from
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 16:12:36 -0700
Adrian Klaver wrote:
> https://marshmallow.readthedocs.io/en/dev/code_of_conduct.html
Personally I don't give a toss about politolosophy, I think idiocy, no matter
how well-meaning, is still idiocy and is probably contaguious via
"normalization of idiocy".
As long as subscribers to the list or attendants at a conference do not violate
explicit or implicit house rules, what business does Postgres have worrying
about what they do or say elsewhere? Some version of an 'all-of-life' clause
may be appropriate to the Marines or federal judges, but it
On 2018-09-16 00:00, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> On 15/09/18 08:17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yeah, this. The PG community is mostly nice people, AFAICT. I'll be
>> astonished (and worried) if the CoC committee finds much to do. We're
>> implementing this mostly to make newcomers to the project feel that
On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 8:11 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Martin Mueller writes:
> > Which makes me say again "Where is the problem that needs solving?"
>
> We've re-litigated that point in each burst of CoC discussion for the
> last two-plus years, I think. But, one more time:
>
> * So far as the
