Hello Adrian,
I used to consider this time as the sql execution time approximately. I’ll do
some research and get back to you. Thanks for mentioning it.
Thanks,
Arup Rakshit
a...@zeit.io
> On 29-Sep-2018, at 2:50 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>
> On 9/28/18 12:14 PM, Arup Rakshit wrote:
>> Fo
On 2018-09-28 07:23:59 +0200, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Rob Sargent wrote:
> > > Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> > > > ## Laurenz Albe (laurenz.a...@cybertec.at):
> > > >
> > > > > vm.overcommit_memory = 2
> > > > > vm_overcommit_ratio = 100
> > > > >
> > > > > Linux commits (swap * overcommit_rati
*Context*
I am using row-level security along with triggers to implement a pure SQL
RBAC implementation. While doing so I encountered a weird behavior between
INSERT triggers and SELECT row-level security policies.
*Question*
I have posted a very detailed question on StackOverflow here:
https://st
Don't you have been surprised by the duration of a query (seen in psql with
\timing)
and the duration for the same query found in pgss ?
It seems that writting the first query text to file takes some time,
that high execution rate on the same query could generate waits on locks
as when pgss is u
On 28/09/2018 21:39 , Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 9/28/18 3:49 PM, marcelo wrote:
For a new big and convoluted project I (am/was) using Devart´s
LinqConnect as ORM.
But today I experienced some inexplicable "object reference not set
to an instance of an object" exceptions or other more specific t
On 9/28/18 7:05 PM, Raghavendra Rao J S V wrote:
Hi All,
Hope you all are recommending below settings to maintain only max 30
days logs in *pg_log* directory. Please correct me if I am wrong.
Well it would actually be 31 days as:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/strft
Hello Tom,
I have another query, where I am expecting the sort from index, but it is in
memory and takes lot of time.
Query:
explain analyze select
*
from
"standard_workitems"
where
"standard_workitems"."deleted_at" is null
and "standard_workitems"."company_id"
When I keep the sort off, I see it is executing much more faster.
set enable_sort = off;
explain analyze select
*
from
"standard_workitems"
where
"standard_workitems"."deleted_at" is null
and "standard_workitems"."company_id" =
'6fed40b7-fdd7-4efb-a163-c2b42e648
On 9/28/18 11:35 PM, Carl Sverre wrote:
*Context*
I am using row-level security along with triggers to implement a pure
SQL RBAC implementation. While doing so I encountered a weird behavior
between INSERT triggers and SELECT row-level security policies.
*Question*
I have posted a very detail
On 9/29/18 6:47 AM, marcelo wrote:
On 28/09/2018 21:39 , Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 9/28/18 3:49 PM, marcelo wrote:
For a new big and convoluted project I (am/was) using Devart´s
LinqConnect as ORM.
But today I experienced some inexplicable "object reference not set
to an instance of an object"
Em 28/09/2018 19:49, marcelo escreveu:
For a new big and convoluted project I (am/was) using Devart´s
LinqConnect as ORM.
But today I experienced some inexplicable "object reference not set to
an instance of an object" exceptions or other more specific to this
libraries.
I would wish to change
сб, 29 сент. 2018 г. в 1:50, marcelo :
>
> For a new big and convoluted project I (am/was) using Devart´s
> LinqConnect as ORM.
> But today I experienced some inexplicable "object reference not set to
> an instance of an object" exceptions or other more specific to this
> libraries.
> I would wish
On 29/09/2018 16:09 , Edson Carlos Ericksson Richter wrote:
Em 28/09/2018 19:49, marcelo escreveu:
For a new big and convoluted project I (am/was) using Devart´s
LinqConnect as ORM.
But today I experienced some inexplicable "object reference not set
to an instance of an object" exceptions or
13 matches
Mail list logo