On 8/20/19 11:17 PM, Vikas Sharma wrote:> Hello,
> We are using postgresql 9.5 with repmgr 3.3.2 in streaming replication setup
> with 1 master and 2 slaves. I have noticed that the pg_xlog on slaves has
> grown to 200GB and is still growing.
>
> Please advise why pg_xlog is growing and not
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:07 PM Day, David wrote:
> EXECUTE format ('ALTER TABLE %s RENAME %s TO %s', schema_table_,
> old_name_, new_name);
Hard to say without the error, but any chance there is a quoting problem?
EXECUTE format ('ALTER TABLE %s RENAME %I TO %I', schema_table_,
old_name_,
FWIW, the second process (110181) is a child of the main process (33438). I
can't recall if any maintenance process that gets automatically activated
(autovacuum, checkpoint, stats, etc.) shows with the same name as the main
process.
Cheers,
Steve
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 1:32 PM chiru r wrote:
På tirsdag 20. august 2019 kl. 22:32:25, skrev chiru r mailto:chir...@gmail.com>>:
Hi All,
I have observed one of our PostgreSQL DB instance showing two postgres process
on Linux server as highlighted. The second postgres process is on and off.
We did not find any references in logs.
[...]
(sorry for the top-post - blame GMail)
-Steve
>
Thank you Adrian.
Is the on/off on a regular interval?
> My guess is a script(cron possibly) is trying to start the server.
>
> Yes, It is regular interval.
No Con-jobs scheduled on server or even remotely.
>
> > We did not find any references in logs.
>
> The information:
>
> sudo
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 6:33 AM Karl Martin Skoldebrand <
ks0c77...@techmahindra.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just discovered that a client has done this:
>
> They have two web applications A1 and A2. They have seperate
> hostnames/URLs. Both have a production and a test database A1p and A1t/ A2p
>
On 2019-08-20 10:33:17 +, Karl Martin Skoldebrand wrote:
> I just discovered that a client has done this:
>
> They have two web applications A1 and A2. They have seperate hostnames/URLs.
> Both have a production and a test database A1p and A1t/ A2p and A2t.
>
> What they've done is have both
"Day, David" writes:
> The error is something like column already exists and
Not sure about the workflow this function is used within, but maybe you
need to consider what to do when both the old and new column names exist.
Because that sure sounds like what is happening.
On 8/20/19 1:32 PM, chiru r wrote:
Hi All,
I have observed one of our PostgreSQL DB instance showing two postgres
process on Linux server as highlighted. The second postgres process is
on and off.
Is the on/off on a regular interval?
My guess is a script(cron possibly) is trying to start
Hi All,
I have observed one of our PostgreSQL DB instance showing two postgres
process on Linux server as highlighted. The second postgres process is on
and off.
We did not find any references in logs.
Please provide your advice and help on this issue.
DB version : PostgreSQL *9.5.10*
On 8/20/19 12:50 PM, Day, David wrote:
Thanks for the feedback.
The error is something like column already exists and
Quoting issue is Unlikely, and as I mentioned it works as expected if Im
repeating the patch in 11
The above and below us are the parts I am not understanding.
Can you
Thanks for the feedback.
The error is something like column already exists and
Quoting issue is Unlikely, and as I mentioned it works as expected if Im
repeating the patch in 11.3
And I assume would if I was in 9.6.
I suspect it has something to do with the content, or lack of, in the
On 8/20/19 12:07 PM, Day, David wrote:
I have a function used by my patch files which attempts to determine if the old
column name exists, if so it proceeds with the rename.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sys.rename_column(schema_table_ regclass, old_name_
text, new_name text)
RETURNS boolean
I have a function used by my patch files which attempts to determine if the old
column name exists, if so it proceeds with the rename.
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION sys.rename_column(schema_table_ regclass, old_name_
text, new_name text)
RETURNS boolean
LANGUAGE plpgsql
AS $function$
BEGIN
Thank you for your responses Rob. Appreciated. The problem with recursive
queries is that they are executed several times and it has and impact in
performance.
I need a subset of those rows and I want them in one pass.
I discovered that ltree extension could be useful. I will play with it
today.
On 8/20/19 8:02 AM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 8/20/19 7:37 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
That is a bummer.
Since I have no idea how to safely install an older version of pg_dump
alongside my current 10.10 install, I will wait for the patch.
A quick test showed that:
1) Go here:
Stephen Frost writes:
> * Vik Fearing (vik.fear...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
>> We generally discourage updating the catalogs directly. This was why I
>> wrote the CREATE/ALTER DATABASE patch in 2014 that you helped me with
>> (fbb1d7d73f8).
>> I'm willing to work on a patch for ALTER TYPE if it
On 8/20/19 7:37 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Op 8/20/2019 om 3:32 PM schreef Adrian Klaver:
On 8/20/19 6:18 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Op 8/20/2019 om 2:07 PM schreef Ian Barwick:
On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server
with
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, 23:36 Shital A, wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, 18:47 Shital A, wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Need advise on below situation:
>>
>> Postgres 9.6
>> Pacemaker 1.1.19
>> Corosync 2.4.3
>>
>> We are testing HA setup on a two node cluster using pacemaker, corosync
>> stack. The
Greetings,
* Vikas Sharma (shavi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> We are using postgresql 9.5 with repmgr 3.3.2 in streaming replication
> setup with 1 master and 2 slaves. I have noticed that the pg_xlog on slaves
> has grown to 200GB and is still growing.
>
> Please advise why pg_xlog is growing and not
Hi Devrim,
Thank you so much for pointing this out!
I thought I had done enough searching on how to work around this, but
apparently not.
This worked perfectly.
Ubence Quevedo
IT Applications Analyst
Information Technology Services, Business Services
Merced County Office of Education
632 West
Op 8/20/2019 om 3:32 PM schreef Adrian Klaver:
On 8/20/19 6:18 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Op 8/20/2019 om 2:07 PM schreef Ian Barwick:
On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server
with postgres 10.10, I get an error, listed
Greetings,
* Vik Fearing (vik.fear...@2ndquadrant.com) wrote:
> On 19/08/2019 19:32, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson" writes:
> >> I meant ALTER TYPE. Adding the send and recv functions doesn't seem
> >> to supported by ALTER TYPE.
> >> Is there a workaround for this?
> > You
Greetings,
* Kyotaro Horiguchi (horikyota@gmail.com) wrote:
> At Mon, 19 Aug 2019 10:07:30 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote
> in <20190819140730.gh16...@tamriel.snowman.net>
> > * Ron (ronljohnso...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > On 8/19/19 5:40 AM, Shiwangini Shishulkar wrote:
> > > >We have scheduled
Hello,
We are using postgresql 9.5 with repmgr 3.3.2 in streaming replication
setup with 1 master and 2 slaves. I have noticed that the pg_xlog on slaves
has grown to 200GB and is still growing.
Please advise why pg_xlog is growing and not pruning itself, is there any
parameter I need to setup
Adrian Klaver writes:
> On 8/20/19 6:18 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
>> Will installing Postgres 11 also work? (Not the Ubuntu18.04 default for
>> Postgres, but doable).
>> Or does those pg_dump versions also expect pg_opfamily to exist?
> From the bug that introduced the issue:
>
=?UTF-8?Q?Toni_C=C3=A1rdenas?= writes:
> Imagine the same `SELECT ... NOWAIT` statement, which returns rows R1 and
> R2, is run from concurrent connections S1 and S2.
> 1. S1 obtains and locks R1.
> 2. S2 obtains and locks R2.
> 3. S1 tries to obtain R2, but it's locked by S2.
> 4. S2 tries
On 8/20/19 6:18 AM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Op 8/20/2019 om 2:07 PM schreef Ian Barwick:
On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server with
postgres 10.10, I get an error, listed hereunder:
I am trying to get a mydump_x_x_x.sql
Op 8/20/2019 om 2:07 PM schreef Ian Barwick:
On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server with
postgres 10.10, I get an error, listed hereunder:
I am trying to get a mydump_x_x_x.sql file to use to reinstall on the
target
> On Aug 19, 2019, at 7:42 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a huge table (100 million rows) of relations between nodes by id in a
> Postgresql 11 server. Like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE relations (
> pid INTEGER NOT NULL,
> cid INTEGER NOT NULL,
> )
>
> This table has
On 8/20/19 7:12 PM, Erwin Moller wrote:
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server with postgres
10.10, I get an error, listed hereunder:
I am trying to get a mydump_x_x_x.sql file to use to reinstall on the target
machine.
From my new machine I connect to my old
The docs say (emphasis mine):
> FOR UPDATE, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE are locking
clauses; they affect how SELECT locks rows **as they are obtained from the
table**.
> With NOWAIT, the statement reports an error, rather than waiting, if a
selected row cannot be locked
The docs say (emphasis mine):
> FOR UPDATE, FOR NO KEY UPDATE, FOR SHARE and FOR KEY SHARE are locking
clauses; they affect how SELECT locks rows **as they are obtained from the
table**.
> With NOWAIT, the statement reports an error, rather than waiting, if a
selected row cannot be locked
Hi,
While trying to move an old 8.1 Postgres install to a new server with
postgres 10.10, I get an error, listed hereunder:
I am trying to get a mydump_x_x_x.sql file to use to reinstall on the
target machine.
From my new machine I connect to my old machine like this:
erwin@ubuntu:~$
Hi,
I just discovered that a client has done this:
They have two web applications A1 and A2. They have seperate hostnames/URLs.
Both have a production and a test database A1p and A1t/ A2p and A2t.
What they've done is have both A1p and A2p on the same actual databaser server
and A1t and
Hi,
https://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/100-Installing-PostgreSQL-on-RHEL-8.html
Regards, Devrim
On 20 August 2019 00:42:06 GMT+03:00, Ubence Quevedo wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>My apologies first in case this has been posted, but I couldn't find a
>thread related to my
> On Aug 19, 2019, at 7:42 PM, pabloa98 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a huge table (100 million rows) of relations between nodes by id in a
> Postgresql 11 server. Like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE relations (
> pid INTEGER NOT NULL,
> cid INTEGER NOT NULL,
> )
>
> This table has
38 matches
Mail list logo
