I've been experimenting with the FTS features in Postgres over the past few
days. Mind blow.
We're deployed on RDS, which does not give you any file system to access.
I'd love to be able to create a custom thesaurus dictionary for our
situation, which seems like it is impossible in a setup like ou
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 6:30 PM Alexander Pyhalov wrote:
> I see that at some point several postgresql backends start consuming about 16
> GB RAM. If we account for shared_buffers, it meens 4 GB RAM for private
> backend memory. How can we achieve such numbers? I don't see any long-running
> (
[The manual for Postgres 12 says][1]:
> The following operations are always parallel restricted.
> - Scans of common table expressions (CTEs).
> - Scans of temporary tables.
> - ...
Further down on the same [manual page:][2]
> [...] Similarly, functions must be marked PARALLEL RESTRICTED if
On 10/16/19 1:05 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
9.6.5 version?
Pg_dump -p 5433 -U postgres -Fc -d dbkerp -n param > param.dump
And
Pg_restore -p 5432 -U postgres -d dbkerp param.dump
Server with pg_dump is Linux red hat 7
On 10/16/19 1:47 PM, PegoraroF10 wrote:
I have replication using Publication/Subscription and configured with REPLICA
IDENTITY DEFAULT, so it uses PK values to do the replication. Then, I´ve
imported data in a new schema and that has several tables with a record with
its PK = 0. Replication works
On 10/16/19 1:05 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
9.6.5 version?
Pg_dump -p 5433 -U postgres -Fc -d dbkerp -n param > param.dump
And
Pg_restore -p 5432 -U postgres -d dbkerp param.dump
Server with pg_dump is Linux red hat 7
On 10/16/19 12:55 PM, Ron wrote:
On 10/16/19 2:40 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
version, I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
What commands
On 10/16/19 12:51 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
On 10/16/19 1:40 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
version, I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
What
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
9.6.5 version?
Pg_dump -p 5433 -U postgres -Fc -d dbkerp -n param > param.dump
And
Pg_restore -p 5432 -U postgres -d dbkerp param.dump
Server with pg_dump is Linux red hat 7.6
Server with pg_restore is linux red hat 6.5
I
> On Oct 16, 2019, at 2:55 PM, Ron wrote:
>
> On 10/16/19 2:40 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>> On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
>>> Good afternoon,
>>>
>>> I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
>>> version, I got an error, and I found this page to
I have replication using Publication/Subscription and configured with REPLICA
IDENTITY DEFAULT, so it uses PK values to do the replication. Then, I´ve
imported data in a new schema and that has several tables with a record with
its PK = 0. Replication works but my application doesn´t because it nee
On 10/16/19 2:40 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
version, I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 ver
On 10/16/19 1:40 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
version, I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 v
On 10/14/19 3:27 PM, Lizeth Solis Aramayo wrote:
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5
version, I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
What commands did you use to dump the 9.6.15 version and restore to the
9.6.5 version?
W
Good afternoon,
I am working with postgresql 9.6.15 and I need to restore in a 9.6.5 version,
I got an error, and I found this page to install a patch
https://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1834/
CVE-2018-1058
But I don't k now how to download the patch, please may you help me?
Thank you a
We've been happily using pgsql to store user-generated documents for a
while now. We also wanted to be able to search the documents so we
tossed the document contents into a tsvector and did a pretty
straightforward contents @@ phraseto_tsquery('simple', 'the query').
Our users have a lot of thing
Thank you so much for your help!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us]
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 2:19 PM
To: Lu, Dan
Cc: Christopher Browne ; Francisco Olarte
; pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres 10.7 Systemd Startup Issue
"Lu, Dan" writes
Greeting,
I have a follow-up question regarding PostgreSQL configure option.
Example:
./configure --prefix=/hostname/pg/PostgreSQL-11.5 --with-systemd --with-openssl
Above example I configure PG with 2 options:
1. with-systemd
2. with-openssl
Is there a catalog view that I can query to see what
"pg_rewind is a tool for synchronizing a PostgreSQL cluster with another
copy of the same cluster, after the clusters' timelines have diverged. A
typical scenario is to bring an old master server back online after
failover as a standby that follows the new master."
-https://www.postgresql.org/docs/
Hello.
After looking at my DBMS server for some time I've understood that I don't
understand what was going on...
A server has 48 GB RAM. shared_buffers is set to 12GB, work_mem - to 32MB,
pgbouncer in transaction mode is used to connect pool (pool size 80) to
PostgreSQL 10.5 server.
I see t
On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 20:34 -0700, raylu wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 3:35 PM Alan Hodgson > wrote:
> > My company has found the pg_trm extension to be more useful for
> > partial text searches than the full text functions. I don't know
> > specifically how it might help with your hyphens but
On 10/16/19 5:32 AM, Sonam Sharma wrote:
How auto vaccum and vaccum are different ?
How analyze and auto analyze are different ?
We were running load on a table which yesterday took 3 mins and today it
took 30 mins. The autovaccum and autoanalyze are happening daily . But
the manual vaccum and
How auto vaccum and vaccum are different ?
How analyze and auto analyze are different ?
We were running load on a table which yesterday took 3 mins and today it
took 30 mins. The autovaccum and autoanalyze are happening daily . But the
manual vaccum and analyze ran on 26th.
Can someone please help
Hi,
Maybe - you can re-use this backup tricks.
"Speeding up dump/restore process"
https://www.depesz.com/2009/09/19/speeding-up-dumprestore-process/
for example:
"""
*Idea was: All these tables had primary key based on serial. We could
easily get min and max value of the primary key column, and
Hello,
I don't understand why the following two JSON Path expressions aren't doing the
same thing in Postgres 12:
with sample (data) as (
values
('{"k1": {"list":[1,2,3]}}'::jsonb)
)
select data,
jsonb_path_exists(data, '$.k1.list.type() ? (@ == "array")'),
raylu wrote:
> to_tsvector('simple', 'UVW-789-XYZ') is
> 'uvw':1 '-789':2 'xyz':3
> because -789 is a negative integer. If we turn the query '789-XYZ'
> into the tsquery as before, we get to_tsquery('simple', '789 <-> xyz')
> which doesn't match it.
>
> Are we missing something here? Is t
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:07 PM M Tarkeshwar Rao
wrote:
> Above processes are bind on all the interfaces of a machine. Is there any
> configuration in postgresql.conf or any other configuration of postgres which
> will make this possible to listen on particular interface?
Listening on an INTER
Hi guys,
We are in process of testing a Postgres 9.6 active-passive HA cluster using
streaming replication on Rhel 7.6.
We have setup Postgres 9.6 primary/warm standby streaming synchorous
replication.
We have set synchronous_standby_names=* and synchronous_commit=on.
To test we have 5 sql
Hi all,
postmaste 2917 postgres3u IPv452341 0t0 TCP *:5432 (LISTEN)
postmaste 2917 postgres4u IPv652342 0t0 TCP *:5432 (LISTEN)
Above processes are bind on all the interfaces of a machine. Is there any
configuration in postgresql.conf or any other configurati
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:22 PM Durgamahesh Manne
wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:09 PM Luca Ferrari wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:27 AM Durgamahesh Manne
>> wrote:
>> > Is there any way to reduce dump time when i take dump of the table
>> which has 148gb in size without creati
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 3:09 PM Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:27 AM Durgamahesh Manne
> wrote:
> > Is there any way to reduce dump time when i take dump of the table
> which has 148gb in size without creating partition* on that table has 148gb
> in size ?
>
> I would at least
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:27 AM Durgamahesh Manne
wrote:
> Is there any way to reduce dump time when i take dump of the table which has
> 148gb in size without creating partiton on that table has 148gb in size ?
I would at least try a parallel dump: should it be -j option to pg_dump.
I'm not s
Hi there,
I have been testing out the following architecture for PostgreSQL HA.
+-+
+-+ VIP ++
| +-+|
||
+--v---+ +--v---+
| pgBouncer | | pgBouncer |
| + | |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 4:12 PM Luca Ferrari wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 11:51 AM Durgamahesh Manne
> wrote:
> > Logical dump of that table is taking more than 7 hours to be completed
> >
> > I need to reduce to dump time of that table that has 88GB in size
>
> Good luck!
> I would see tw
34 matches
Mail list logo
