Ah, I do appear to have that enabled (inside Heroku's config), but I can't
find anything like that in the logs, so I've opened a ticket with them. Thx
a lot!
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 2:25 PM Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2020-05-29 12:42:47 -0500, Chris Morris wrote:
> > We're using Heroku's PG,
>
On 2020-05-29 12:42:47 -0500, Chris Morris wrote:
> We're using Heroku's PG,
[...]
> Other than polling pg_stat_activity (which isn't 100% accurate depending on
> timing), is there a good way to audit connections? To detect which roles are
> being used for connections?
Do you have access to the lo
On 5/29/20 8:19 AM, Tanja Savic wrote:
Hi,
We did the upgrade of PostgreSQL 10 to 12 on linux server. Everything
was fine (can connect via pgAdmin, data is there…) except two
tablespaces which are still in directory for PostgreSQL 10.
So we followed these steps to move tablespaces:
https://
We're using Heroku's PG, and it comes with a default, almost super-user.
I'm wanting to restrict that account for only our production app servers,
and have anyone connecting for personal queries to go through an assigned
role by employee (that's all setup and working).
Other than polling pg_stat_a
Tanja Savic writes:
> The configuration file path is /etc/postgresql/12/main/ postgresql.conf and
> it is configured in /var/lib/postgresql/12/main/postmaster.opts:
> "/usr/lib/postgresql/12/bin/postgres "-D" "/var/lib/postgresql/12/main" "-c"
> "config_file=/etc/postgresql/12/main/postgresql.c
Hi,
We did the upgrade of PostgreSQL 10 to 12 on linux server. Everything was fine
(can connect via pgAdmin, data is there...) except two tablespaces which are
still in directory for PostgreSQL 10.
So we followed these steps to move tablespaces:
https://www.enterprisedb.com/blog/moving-tablespa
Gabriele Bulfon writes:
> Amazing! Rebuilt without -O and it worked like a charm!
Yeah, modern compilers tend to apply optimizations that break old versions
of Postgres. -O0 usually takes care of it.
regards, tom lane
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 7:08 AM Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
> Amazing! Rebuilt without -O and it worked like a charm!
> Thanks, at the moment I need to stick to 9.0.9 on this machine to be able
> to reuse the same database files.
>
>
Just to be thorough. You can update to 9.0.23 (i.e., build against
Amazing! Rebuilt without -O and it worked like a charm!
Thanks, at the moment I need to stick to 9.0.9 on this machine to be able to
reuse the same database files.
Thanks!
Gabriele
Sonicle S.r.l.
:
http://www.sonicle.com
Music:
http://www.gabrielebulfon.com
Quantum Mechanics :
http://www
On 5/29/20 6:32 AM, Gabriele Bulfon wrote:
Hi, I had to build postgres 9.0.9 from sources to run it under our new
XStreamOS/illumos release.
First 9.0 is ~ 5 years past EOL and it ended at 9.0.23.
Second this is as close as I could come to a solution:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/179
Hi, I had to build postgres 9.0.9 from sources to run it under our new
XStreamOS/illumos release.
It used to build and run without problems in previous releases.
On this, just by running initdb I get these errors:
sonicle@xstorage1:/sonicle$ initdb -D /sonicle/pgdata
The files belonging to this
Hello,
We're getting to the finish line in the port of our servers to
PostgreSQL 11.4. and started valgrind'ing the code, as the PostgreSQL is
new in the servers. Of course we have our own homework to do, but there
are also complaints of valgrind pointing to the lib/libecpg.so.6.11, for
example:
On 2020-05-26 12:04 PM, David Rowley wrote:
Since "my_table" is small, you'd likely be much better doing a manual
rewrite of the query to join a subquery containing the required
details from "my_table". It looks like you want the row_id from the
latest tran_date for each fld_N column. So som
## Peter J. Holzer (hjp-pg...@hjp.at):
> * Update frequently. That reduces the risk of needing a package which
> has since been deleted from a repo, but more importantly it makes it
> easier to pinpoint the cause of a conflict.
This. Plus: make sure you can re-create any machine in a fully de
Hi,
Is there any extension or option in PG to keep information of any (
memory context/some memory address) of backend process in sever/postmaster
main process.
Thanks
Braj
On 2020-05-28 14:36:34 +, Zwettler Markus (OIZ) wrote:
> I'm not talking about this specific bug or its resolution.
>
> I want to talk about the Linux update problem in general.
>
> Anyone updating Linux might get such nerving dependency troubles.
In my experience (having administrated Linux
16 matches
Mail list logo