On 7/13/20 7:37 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 7/13/20 2:56 PM, Ron wrote:
On 7/13/20 2:32 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 7/13/20 12:12 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello there,
One of our PostgreSQL 9.4.1 databases has been backed up as *.gz file
with the compression 9 "pg_dump -Z 9". What is the
On 7/13/20 1:14 PM, FOUTE K. Jaurès wrote:
Hello,
The problem is related to my previous email "PostgreSQL 12 - ERROR:
could not rename file "pg_logical/snapshots/1A-7C00D890.snap.13594.tmp"
to "pg_logical/snapshots/1A-7C00D890.snap": No space left on device" .
After stopping the replication
On 7/13/20 2:56 PM, Ron wrote:
On 7/13/20 2:32 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 7/13/20 12:12 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello there,
One of our PostgreSQL 9.4.1 databases has been backed up as *.gz
file with the compression 9 "pg_dump -Z 9". What is the right format
of restore this file when
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 4:42 PM Jean-Philippe Chenel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I try to give userA privileges on userB objects and same thing to the
> userB, giving privileges on userA objects.
>
> Grant userB to userA; —ok
> Grant userA to userB; —error: role userB is already member of role userA
>
Hi,
I try to give userA privileges on userB objects and same thing to the userB,
giving privileges on userA objects.
Grant userB to userA; —ok
Grant userA to userB; —error: role userB is already member of role userA
How can I do that?
With best regards,
On 7/13/20 2:32 PM, Adrian Klaver wrote:
On 7/13/20 12:12 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello there,
One of our PostgreSQL 9.4.1 databases has been backed up as *.gz file
with the compression 9 "pg_dump -Z 9". What is the right format of
restore this file when needed? Can I run the restore from
Hello,
The problem is related to my previous email "PostgreSQL 12 - ERROR: could
not rename file "pg_logical/snapshots/1A-7C00D890.snap.13594.tmp" to
"pg_logical/snapshots/1A-7C00D890.snap": No space left on device" .
After stopping the replication postgresql has restarted to respond.
Le lun. 13
On 7/13/20 12:12 PM, Julie Nishimura wrote:
Hello there,
One of our PostgreSQL 9.4.1 databases has been backed up as *.gz file
with the compression 9 "pg_dump -Z 9". What is the right format of
restore this file when needed? Can I run the restore from a compressed
file or I need to unzip the
Hello there,
One of our PostgreSQL 9.4.1 databases has been backed up as *.gz file with the
compression 9 "pg_dump -Z 9". What is the right format of restore this file
when needed? Can I run the restore from a compressed file or I need to unzip
the file first, then run pg_restore? Thanks
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:53:46 + (UTC)
Laurent FAILLIE wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been asked by one of my customer to know which are the possible
> clustering solution for PostgreSQL ? Active/passive ?Active/active ?
> if possible free or not too expensive.
Start first by setting up safe and
On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 10:05:52 +1000
James Sewell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I’m trying to work out a procedure for a safe zero data loss switchover
> under (high) load, which allows the old master to be reconnected without
> the use of pgrewind.
>
> Would the following be sane?
>
> - open connection
Greetings,
* Paul Förster (paul.foers...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On 13. Jul, 2020, at 18:00, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Ah, yes, if you rebuild the replica from a backup (or from the primary),
> > then sure, that's pretty similar to the pgbackrest delta restore, except
> > that when using delta
Hi Stephen,
> On 13. Jul, 2020, at 18:00, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> A pgbackrest delta restore will scan the entire data directory and
> verify every file matches the last backup, or it'll replace the file
> with what was in the backup that's being used. If there's an error
> during any of
Greetings,
* Paul Förster (paul.foers...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On 13. Jul, 2020, at 17:47, Stephen Frost wrote:
> >
> > Sure, Patroni will handle the failover fine- but that's not what I was
> > referring to. If the server crashes and you have no idea why or what
> > happened, I would strongly
Hi Stephen,
> On 13. Jul, 2020, at 17:47, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> Sure, Patroni will handle the failover fine- but that's not what I was
> referring to. If the server crashes and you have no idea why or what
> happened, I would strongly recommend against using pg_rewind to rebuild
> it to be
Greetings,
* Paul Förster (paul.foers...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > On 10. Jul, 2020, at 17:45, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Sure, if you know exactly why the former primary failed and have
> > confidence that nothing actually bad happened then pg_rewind can work
> > (though it's still not what I'd
On 7/13/20 12:31 AM, Rama Krishnan wrote:
Hi sir,
I m preparing for interview one of the recruiter asked me mvcc drawbacks
as i told due to mvcc it use more space and need to perform maintenance
activity.
Another one is the same data causes an update conflict because two
different
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020, 7:16 PM FOUTE K. Jaurès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> How can i solve this error
>
More info required
Regards,
Seenu.
>
> --
> Jaurès FOUTE
>
Hello,
How can i solve this error ?
--
Jaurès FOUTE
Rama:
1st of all, please do not top post, specially if you want to discuss
examples, I'm not goint to hunt up and down for the relevant sections.
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:52 AM Rama Krishnan wrote:
> Still, I have a doubt as per your example both are trying to update the same
> tuple so it
Hello,
I have a strange error when using logical replication between a 11.2 (I know!)
source database and a 12.3 target.
If I create the publication with all needed tables (about 50) at once, I get
"duplicate key value violates unique constraint xxx_pkey" errors during the
initial replication
On 7/13/2020 4:52 AM, Rama Krishnan wrote:
For example, two transactions are going to increase the amount on the
same account by $100 . The first transaction reads the current value
($1000) and then the second transaction reads the same value. The first
transaction increases the amount
Hello,
I noticed a behavior that was surprising to me,
so I wanted to know if such behavior is expected.
I created a partial unique index on table "t",
and a prepared statement in which a subexpression
of the index's WHERE clause figures as a parameter.
# CREATE TABLE t(i int);
# CREATE
Hi Francisco,
Still, I have a doubt as per your example both are trying to update the
same tuple so it may produce two different copies right?
I read some blocks they mentioned drawback above two things
It may lead to lost update also
For example, two transactions are going to increase the
Rama:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 9:52 AM Rama Krishnan wrote:
> I m preparing for interview one of the recruiter asked me mvcc drawbacks as i
> told due to mvcc it use more space and need to perform maintenance activity.
> Another one is the same data causes an update conflict because two
Hi sir,
I m preparing for interview one of the recruiter asked me mvcc drawbacks as
i told due to mvcc it use more space and need to perform maintenance
activity.
Another one is the same data causes an update conflict because two
different transactions can update the same version of the row.
he
26 matches
Mail list logo
