On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:20:51PM +, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Frankly, I’m not certain, I believe the developers are using a messaging
> intermediary.
Oh, well, then you would need to find out if they are transfering the
value via text or binary. It is kind of hard to extract query
Frankly, I’m not certain, I believe the developers are using a messaging
intermediary.
pg
From: Bruce Momjian
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 5:19 PM
To: Godfrin, Philippe E
Cc: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Numeric data types
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:14:48PM +,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:14:48PM +, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Fabulous, thanks much.
You still have not told us how you are transfering the data, so we can
be sure.
---
>
> From: Bruce Momjian
> Sent: Monday,
Fabulous, thanks much.
From: Bruce Momjian
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 4:56 PM
To: Godfrin, Philippe E
Cc: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Numeric data types
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:32:23PM +, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Thanks Bruce, I suppose you mean n32
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:32:23PM +, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Thanks Bruce, I suppose you mean n32 -> n64 OK, but n64->n32 chance of 32-bit
> overflow…
Uh, I was thinking that your 32-bit values could roll over and the other
end would be confused, but I can also see the 64-bit going
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 10:32 AM Susan Hurst
wrote:
>
> For example, a batch load script that inserts multiple rows into a table
> may call an insert function within a cursor to populate each row into
> the target table. Meanwhile, a non-technical business user may want to
> create only one
Thanks Bruce, I suppose you mean n32 -> n64 OK, but n64->n32 chance of 32-bit
overflow...
pg
From: Bruce Momjian
Sent: Monday, August 31, 2020 11:54 AM
To: Godfrin, Philippe E
Cc: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Numeric data types
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:38:05PM +,
Is there a significant difference in execution speed between similar
functions that do the same DML but differ in the extra validations and
messaging that are required for providing feedback to UI users?
For example, a batch load script that inserts multiple rows into a table
may call an
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 04:38:05PM +, Godfrin, Philippe E wrote:
> Greetings Listees (frist time poster!)
>
>
>
> Considering the difference between 64 bit and 32 bit numeric datatypes. We
> have
> source databases that are running 32 bit. They send their data to a larger
> cluster that
Greetings Listees (frist time poster!)
Considering the difference between 64 bit and 32 bit numeric datatypes. We have
source databases that are running 32 bit. They send their data to a larger
cluster that is running 64 bit. Should there be something special done in order
to accommodate the
po 31. 8. 2020 v 13:29 odesílatel Thomas Kellerer napsal:
> Thorsten Schöning schrieb am 31.08.2020 um 12:37:
> > So for what query size or number of IDs to compare in IN would you
> > consider a different approach at all?
>
>
> In my experience "hundreds" of IDs tend to be quite slow if used
Thanks Laurenz for your email
Le lun. 31 août 2020 à 09:42, Laurenz Albe a
écrit :
> On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:18 +0200, Thomas Boussekey wrote:
> > You can find at the end of this email, a new version of the script that
> I use to remove the TOAST table on pg_largobject catalog table.
> > I
"Yorwerth, Adam" writes:
> We seem to have found a situation where a query run using explain analyse or
> pgbench is incredibly fast, but run via Java under load performs very poorly
> – we’ve checked query performance metrics for our Postgres instance and can
> confirm that it’s the query
Hi Adam,
What're the query times when you run the query directly on the psql prompt, but
without explain/analyze?
Can you check the cache hit rate vs disk read on explain analyze vs from java?
Sometimes, the data's in RAM when you run a query manually, but the live Java
app might be hitting
Hi Postgres community,
We seem to have found a situation where a query run using explain analyse or
pgbench is incredibly fast, but run via Java under load performs very poorly –
we’ve checked query performance metrics for our Postgres instance and can
confirm that it’s the query running
Thorsten Schöning schrieb am 31.08.2020 um 12:37:
> So for what query size or number of IDs to compare in IN would you
> consider a different approach at all?
In my experience "hundreds" of IDs tend to be quite slow if used with an IN
clause.
Rewriting the IN to a JOIN against a VALUES clause
Hi all,
if there are several PostgreSQL nodes replicating synchronous and I configure a
guarantee that
for example 3 of 5 nodes have to be in sync to go on with
synchronous_standby_names and
now I want to implement a load balancing scenario with active standby DBs...how
or with what
tool can I
Guten Tag Pavel Stehule,
am Montag, 31. August 2020 um 10:51 schrieben Sie:
> It is not good - it increases the memory necessary for query parsing,
> optimizer and executor are slower.
At least memory and I/O were not a problem regarding my tests,
CPU-load was pretty high. But I was unable to
Guten Tag Laurenz Albe,
am Montag, 31. August 2020 um 10:23 schrieben Sie:
> Is it an option to change that usage pattern?
Not everywhere easily, because I simply have places in which I'm
working with IDs only and e.g. need to check if they are owned by some
user. Those checks are abstracted
po 31. 8. 2020 v 10:04 odesílatel Thorsten Schöning
napsal:
> Hi all,
>
> I have lots of queries in which I need to restrict access to rows
> using some decimal row-ID and am mostly doing so with using the
> operator IN in WHERE-clauses. Additionally I'm mostly embedding the
> IDs as
On Mon, 2020-08-31 at 10:04 +0200, Thorsten Schöning wrote:
> I have lots of queries in which I need to restrict access to rows
> using some decimal row-ID and am mostly doing so with using the
> operator IN in WHERE-clauses. Additionally I'm mostly embedding the
> IDs as ","-seperated list into
Thorsten Schöning writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I have lots of queries in which I need to restrict access to rows
> using some decimal row-ID and am mostly doing so with using the
> operator IN in WHERE-clauses. Additionally I'm mostly embedding the
> IDs as ","-seperated list into the query directly,
On Sat, 2020-08-29 at 21:18 +0200, Thomas Boussekey wrote:
> You can find at the end of this email, a new version of the script that I use
> to remove the TOAST table on pg_largobject catalog table.
> I fixed some typos and wrong synthaxes that I had typed too quickly in my
> first version.
>
>
>
> (2)
>
> I'll use this C code as an example to build an extention in Rust. The
> Postgresql bindings for Rust I have don't contain a definition of
> `FirstLowInvalidHeapAttributeNumber` for some reason. I can define it
> since it's simply single digit constant.
>
Not an answer to your question
24 matches
Mail list logo
