A quick Google search came up with this: https://www.npgsql.org. No
experience with it however.
We moved to Python just before we moved to Postgresql. The key motivator
for C# at the time is now more of a React / JS proponent
Everything in our stack apart from 1 proprietary Java / Oracle
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:58 AM Michael Paquier wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> > I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
> > a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
> > I
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:28:45PM +, Daniel Westermann (DWE) wrote:
> I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is
> a reason that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
> I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily
>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:52:58PM +0200, Alessandro Dentella
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > st 23. 9. 2020 v 10:38 odesílatel Alessandro Dentella <
> > sandro.dente...@gmail.com> napsal:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > disclaimer: I've never been a
On 9/23/20 11:51 AM, tutilu...@tutanota.com wrote:
It is not deprecated or legacy and it is still used by many. The
issue is that people try to do 'partial' dumps without reading the
docs on what those switches actually do and the potential conflicts
therein. For large
That would entail building an AI into the code that would deal with
all the possible OS(versions), Postgres(versions), hardware
permutations.
I... guess. If "AI" means "a series of ifs". Which is what software...
is? I doubt that people who can make the world's most advanced open
>> I have to agree that pg_dump is largely a step child backup program.
>> It has consistently been found over the years to be lacking in a
>> number of areas. Unfortunately, working on pg_dump isn't sexy and it
>> is difficult to get volunteers or even paid resources to do such a
>> thing.
Hi,
I was playing a bit with trusted extensions and wondered if there is a reason
that the "trusted" flag is not exposed in pg_available_extensions.
I believe that information would be quite useful so one can easily identify
extensions that can be installed as "normal" user.
Regards
Daniel
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
>Fra: Alessandro Dentella
>Sendt: 23. september 2020 10:38
>Til: pgsql-general
>Emne: PostgreSQL on Windows' state
>
>Hi,
>
>disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on
>behalf of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use
Alessandro Dentella schrieb am 23.09.2020 um 10:37:
Hi,
disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on behalf
of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use PostgreSQL.
I'd like to understand if what the team replies to him is correct or not.
The final
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:53 PM Alessandro Dentella
wrote:
> Thanks Pavel, but psycopg2 (that I always use is just for Python). T
> hey claim/complain that from c# there's no native solution.
Maybe https://www.npgsql.org/?
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:21:39PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> st 23. 9. 2020 v 10:38 odesílatel Alessandro Dentella <
> sandro.dente...@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on
> > behalf
> > of a friend that has problems
st 23. 9. 2020 v 10:38 odesílatel Alessandro Dentella <
sandro.dente...@gmail.com> napsal:
>
> Hi,
>
> disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on
> behalf
> of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use PostgreSQL.
>
> I'd like to understand if what the
Hi,
disclaimer: I've never been a Windows user and I send this email just on behalf
of a friend that has problems convincing his team to use PostgreSQL.
I'd like to understand if what the team replies to him is correct or not.
The final project should work with Python (we know it just works)
14 matches
Mail list logo
