On 10/23/21 23:12, Lucas wrote:
I don't know where you have your database deployed, but in my case is
in AWS EC2 instances. The way I handle backups is at the block storage
level, performing EBS snapshots.
Yes, Amazon uses SAN equipment that supports snapshots.
This has proven to work very
On 2021-10-24 06:48, Mladen Gogala wrote:
On 10/23/21 09:37, Laura Smith wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Yes indeed, snapshots is the primary reason, closely followed by
zfssend/receive.
I'm no stranger to using LVM snapshots with ext4/xfs but it requires a
custom shell script to manage the whole
Yes, it does.
>If you used the EDB installer for the Windows install of Postgres then
>you need to use their Language Pack to match up with what the plpython
>expects.
It was obvious, but it didn't work. This is not a problem at the moment.
>This is the Debian project packages, not something the
On 10/23/21 13:00, Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
Да.
Python extension issues occurred on Windows Server 2012 and Windows 10
Pro. Experimentally, when installing version 3.7.4, everything worked.
If you used the EDB installer for the Windows install of Postgres then
you need to use their Language
Да.
Python extension issues occurred on Windows Server 2012 and Windows 10 Pro.
Experimentally, when installing version 3.7.4, everything worked. This is
my first time deploying Debian, and since I didn't want to deploy multiple
versions, I asked a question. I have installed Python 3.10 x64. when
On 10/23/21 09:37, Laura Smith wrote:
Hi Mladen,
Yes indeed, snapshots is the primary reason, closely followed by
zfssend/receive.
I'm no stranger to using LVM snapshots with ext4/xfs but it requires a custom
shell script to manage the whole process around backups. I feel the whole
thing
Ninad Shah writes:
> Would keepalive setting address and mitigate the issue?
[ shrug... ] Maybe; nobody else has more information about this
situation than you do. I suggested something to experiment with.
regards, tom lane
On Saturday, October 23rd, 2021 at 14:03, Mladen Gogala
wrote:
> On 10/23/21 07:29, Laura Smith wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given an upcoming server upgrade, I'm contemplating moving away from XFS to
> > ZFS (specifically the ZoL flavour via Debian 11). BTRFS seems to be falling
> > away (e.g.
On 10/23/21 07:29, Laura Smith wrote:
Hi,
Given an upcoming server upgrade, I'm contemplating moving away from XFS to ZFS
(specifically the ZoL flavour via Debian 11). BTRFS seems to be falling away
(e.g. with Redhat deprecating it etc.), hence my preference for ZFS.
However, somewhere in
On 10/21/21 16:23, Rory Falloon wrote:
Hi,
My postgres server setup is thus: a production database, which is
using WAL streaming (hot standby) to four other hosts of various
latencies. I Have a table that is ~200GB which has been backed up, and
now I Want to remove it. The table is not in
Hi,
Given an upcoming server upgrade, I'm contemplating moving away from XFS to ZFS
(specifically the ZoL flavour via Debian 11). BTRFS seems to be falling away
(e.g. with Redhat deprecating it etc.), hence my preference for ZFS.
However, somewhere in the back of my mind I seem to have a
11 matches
Mail list logo
