I'm on PostgreSQL 15 with essentially a stock configuration.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 8:58 AM Ron wrote:
>
> On 8/14/23 09:54, David Gilman wrote:
> > I have a query that was originally written as a handful of CTEs out of
> > convenience. It is producing a reasonable query pl
r.
My question is: is this a valid bug? I am not sure if I should expect
the view version to find a way to materialize and produce a comparable
query plan. Also, making a minimal test case is going to take a bit
and I don't want to start unless this smells like a genuine bug.
--
David Gilman
:DG<
, 10:57 PM David Rowley wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022 at 13:31, David Gilman wrote:
> >
> > When a fdw table participates in query planning and finds itself as
> > part of a join it can output a parameterized path. If chosen, Postgres
> > will dutifully cal
When a fdw table participates in query planning and finds itself as
part of a join it can output a parameterized path. If chosen, Postgres
will dutifully call the fdw over and over via IterateForeignScan to
fetch matching tuples. Many fdw extensions do network traffic, though,
and it would be
