Re: multiple missing providers from pgdg-common

2024-01-15 Thread Joseph G
I can confirm everything works now, Thank you! Sent via mobile, please excuse typos and brevity. On Mon, Jan 15, 2024, 02:20 Devrim Gündüz wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, 2024-01-13 at 13:23 -0800, Joseph G wrote: > > If we look, gdal35 or 36 is asking for libarmadillo.so.10 which &

Re: multiple missing providers from pgdg-common

2024-01-13 Thread Joseph G
, but none of the providers can be > installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit) needed by > gdal35-libs-3.5.3-4.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg-common > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' > to use not only

Re: multiple missing providers from pgdg-common

2024-01-13 Thread Joseph G
Devrim Gündüz wrote: > What's that ? > > > On 13 January 2024 20:26:19 CET, Joseph G > wrote: > >> Problem: package from @commandline requires postgis33_15, but none >>> of the providers can be installed >>> - package postgis33_15-3.3.1-1.rhel8

multiple missing providers from pgdg-common

2024-01-13 Thread Joseph G
> > Problem: package from @commandline requires postgis33_15, but none of > the providers can be installed > - package postgis33_15-3.3.1-1.rhel8.x86_64 from pgdg15 requires > gdal35-libs >= 3.5.2, but none of the providers can be installed > - package postgis33_15-3.3.1-1.rhel8.x86_64