> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:40 PM <> tutilu...@tutanota.com> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> Well not partial as in incremental. Instead dump only some portion of the
>>> schema with or without its associated data.
>>>
>> It's funny that you should bring that up, considering how it was one of my
>>
> Well not partial as in incremental. Instead dump only some portion of the
> schema with or without its associated data.
>
It's funny that you should bring that up, considering how it was one of my
points... See the point about pg_dump's bug on Windows.
>> I'm saying that PostGIS has a bug
Sep 24, 2020, 8:13 AM by tshel...@gmail.com:
>>
>> On 9/23/20 11:51 AM, >> tutilu...@tutanota.com>> wrote:
>>
> > Huh? A schema is just a name space, why does it matter how the
> > extension chooses to define it? I mean you could have number of
> > permutations of postgis.
> >
> >
(I can't believe I'm replying to this drivel...)
>> > Huh? A schema is just a name space, why does it matter how the
>> > extension chooses to define it? I mean you could have number of
>> > permutations of postgis.
>> >
>> > I'm saying that PostGIS has a bug due to incorrectly
>> I have to agree that pg_dump is largely a step child backup program.
>> It has consistently been found over the years to be lacking in a
>> number of areas. Unfortunately, working on pg_dump isn't sexy and it
>> is difficult to get volunteers or even paid resources to do such a
>> thing.
Sep 21, 2020, 7:53 PM by j...@commandprompt.com:
> I have to agree that pg_dump is largely a step child backup program. It has
> consistently been found over the years to be lacking in a number of areas.
> Unfortunately, working on pg_dump isn't sexy and it is difficult to get
> volunteers or
Even though I highly appreciate that PostgreSQL, a database software which
doesn't cost money, exists *at all*, that fact is oftentimes overshadowed by a
small but important number of very frustrating issues which I consider to
largely ruin the overall "experience" of using PostgreSQL. I'd call
