On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 1:20 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
>
> In any case I don't see you getting a 9.5 version on the laptop in the
> package directories. Pretty sure the Fedora 30 repos will not have 9.5
> and the Postgres repos don't go back to Fedora 30. So if you want a 9.5
> instance you will
On 7/4/21 12:29 PM, W.P. wrote:
>> So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
To be clear the 1TB disk is working where and with what OS?
1TB DISC is connected to OrangePi4 (as I have copied disc "sector by
sector" from 500GB to 1TB, some months ago, I can't
W dniu 04.07.2021 o 21:10, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/4/21 11:59 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 04.07.2021 o 19:48, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/4/21 9:33 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
>> So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
No, I have disc from this machine, looks not damaged (random
files). Only problem that OS does not boot beyond "emergency mode".
I would say your second sentence contradicts your first.
Nope ;). There was 1 500GB
On 7/4/21 11:59 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 04.07.2021 o 19:48, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/4/21 9:33 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk
W dniu 04.07.2021 o 19:48, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/4/21 9:33 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere
else?
No, I
On 7/4/21 9:33 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
No, I have disc from this machine, looks not damaged
On 7/4/21 9:33 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
No, I have disc from this machine, looks not damaged
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 21:05, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
No, I have disc from this machine, looks not damaged (random files).
Only problem that
On 7/2/21 10:18 AM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
So you have backup of the failed machine's disk stored somewhere else?
No, I have disc from this machine, looks not damaged (random files).
Only problem that OS does not boot beyond "emergency mode".
I
W dniu 02.07.2021 o 17:16, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/1/21 9:24 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 22:27, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/1/21 12:56 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 16:19, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5)
On 7/1/21 9:24 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 22:27, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/1/21 12:56 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 16:19, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS
upgrade).
One table
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 22:27, Adrian Klaver pisze:
On 7/1/21 12:56 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 16:19, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS
upgrade).
One table is now damaged, trying to dump it
On 7/1/21 12:56 PM, W.P. wrote:
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 16:19, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS
upgrade).
One table is now damaged, trying to dump it results in server restart,
message is "invalid
W dniu 01.07.2021 o 16:19, Laurenz Albe pisze:
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS upgrade).
One table is now damaged, trying to dump it results in server restart,
message is "invalid record length maximum is yyy"
On Thu, 2021-07-01 at 10:56 +0200, W.P. wrote:
> I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS upgrade).
>
> One table is now damaged, trying to dump it results in server restart,
> message is "invalid record length maximum is yyy" (from memory).
>
> How can I (?) repair
Hi there,
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS upgrade).
One table is now damaged, trying to dump it results in server restart,
message is "invalid record length maximum is yyy" (from memory).
Also fails pg_dumpall.
How can I (?) repair this table? (for
Hi there,
I have a PG 11.12 (was 9.5 or 9.5) upgraded from 9.x (during OS upgrade).
One table is now damaged, trying to dump it results in server restart,
message is "invalid record length maximum is yyy" (from memory).
Also fails pg_dumpall.
How can I (?) repair this table? (for
18 matches
Mail list logo
