Re: Old tsearch functions

2019-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
Howard News writes: > On 30/01/2019 18:08, Tom Lane wrote: >> Note that if you had those functions laying around ever since 8.3, >> they're probably just "loose" and not wrapped into an extension at all. > unfortunately running > create extension tsearch2 from unpackaged; > caused the following

Re: Old tsearch functions

2019-01-31 Thread Howard News
On 30/01/2019 18:08, Tom Lane wrote: Note that if you had those functions laying around ever since 8.3, they're probably just "loose" and not wrapped into an extension at all. You could fix that in a 9.5 database by running create extension tsearch2 from unpackaged; which should be enough

Re: Old tsearch functions

2019-01-30 Thread Tom Lane
Howard News writes: > On 30/01/2019 17:20, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> Is to late to experiment with dropping the extension on a 9.5 database >> and then dumping? > Not a problem - The problem only shows in development so far. I have all > the originals in 9.5 and backups to try this on. Note

Re: Old tsearch functions

2019-01-30 Thread Howard News
On 30/01/2019 17:20, Adrian Klaver wrote: Is to late to experiment with dropping the extension on a 9.5 database and then dumping? Not a problem - The problem only shows in development so far. I have all the originals in 9.5 and backups to try this on.

Re: Old tsearch functions

2019-01-30 Thread Adrian Klaver
tsearch functions in my database, and these were copied into the pg_dump that I restored into v11 and have caused some confusion and problems. For example, select to_tsquery('english', 'hello') would not work. The reason is the additional functions, domains etc that were added to the public

Old tsearch functions

2019-01-30 Thread Howard News
Hi, upgrading from 9.5 to 11.1, I have a few tsearch problems that appear to relate to a much older migration (8.3) Originally, for those that remember that far back, tsearch was a contrib module. However it appears that I still have some of the old tsearch functions in my database