> Posts should be technically and factually correct
agreed and period. no need qualify how the nonsense was created.
-john
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 4:13 PM Robert Treat wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 8:33 AM Greg Sabino Mullane
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Val
On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 8:33 AM Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Vallarapu
> wrote:
>>
>> However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether it
>> is written by AI or a human.
>> AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 02:19:22AM +1000, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 2024-08-20 22:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> > > misleading content can be banned?
> >
On 2024-08-20 22:44, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
misleading content can be banned?
I like this, and feel we are getting closer. How about:
"Posts should be technically a
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> misleading content can be banned?
>
I like this, and feel we are getting closer. How about:
"Posts should be technically and factually correct. Use of AI should be
used
On Tue, Jul 23, 2024 at 12:45 PM Avinash Vallarapu <
avinash.vallar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> However, I do agree with Lawrence that it is impossible to prove whether
> it is written by AI or a human.
> AI can make mistakes and it might mistakenly point out that a blog is
> written by AI (which I kno
Hi,
As someone who has taken days to publish each blog upon so many reviews,
corrections and edits while
attempting to make it as best/informative and as perfect as possible, it
might seem slightly frustrating when
we see some AI generated content, especially when it is misleading readers.
Howeve
On Tue, 2024-07-23 at 10:38 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > Why not say that authors who repeatedly post grossly counterfactual or
> > misleading content can be banned?
>
> Perhaps as you hint at, we need a policy to not just discourage AI-generated
> things, but also wrong/misleading things
On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 3:22 AM Laurenz Albe
wrote:
> I have no problem with that definition, but it is useless as a policy:
> Even in a blog with glaring AI nonsense in it, how can you prove that the
> author did not actually edit and improve other significant parts of the
> text?
>
Well, we ca
On Thu, 2024-07-18 at 10:25 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > But to what degree exactly should that be allowed?
>
> Somewhat ironically, here's a distinction chatgpt and I came up with:
>
> LLM-generated content: Content where the substantial part of the text is
> directly
> created by LLMs
> But to what degree exactly should that be allowed?
Somewhat ironically, here's a distinction chatgpt and I came up with:
LLM-generated content: Content where the substantial part of the text is
directly created by LLMs without significant human alteration or editing.
Human-edited or reviewed c
On Fri, 19 Jul 2024 at 00:31, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> Perhaps there could be a way to report misleading, bad content and a policy
> that says
> that you can be banned if you repeatedly write grossly misleading and
> counterfactual
> content. Stuff like "to improve performance, set fast_mode = on
I wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 13:21 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> > I've been noticing a growing trend of blog posts written mostly, if not
> > entirely, with AI
> > (aka LLMs, ChatGPT, etc.). I'm not sure where to raise this issue. I
> > considered a blog post,
> > but this mailing list
On Wed, 2024-07-17 at 13:21 -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> I've been noticing a growing trend of blog posts written mostly, if not
> entirely, with AI
> (aka LLMs, ChatGPT, etc.). I'm not sure where to raise this issue. I
> considered a blog post,
> but this mailing list seemed a better foru
On 7/17/24 10:21, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
I've been noticing a growing trend of blog posts written mostly, if not
entirely, with AI (aka LLMs, ChatGPT, etc.). I'm not sure where to raise
this issue. I considered a blog post, but this mailing list seemed a
better forum to generate a discussio
Hi Greg
I agree with you on the misuse of AI based tools, as per my experience with
Postgres the solutions suggested wont work at times.
Its not bad to get help from these tools but put all the solutions from
there is counter productive.
I think People should take care while using these tools whil
st 17. 7. 2024 v 19:22 odesílatel Greg Sabino Mullane
napsal:
> I've been noticing a growing trend of blog posts written mostly, if not
> entirely, with AI (aka LLMs, ChatGPT, etc.). I'm not sure where to raise
> this issue. I considered a blog post, but this mailing list seemed a better
> forum
I've been noticing a growing trend of blog posts written mostly, if not
entirely, with AI (aka LLMs, ChatGPT, etc.). I'm not sure where to raise
this issue. I considered a blog post, but this mailing list seemed a better
forum to generate a discussion.
The problem is two-fold as I see it.
First,
18 matches
Mail list logo
