On 18/11/18 2:04 μ.μ., Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:
On 18.11.2018 12:14, Martín Marqués wrote:
El 18/11/18 a las 04:49, Gerhard Wiesinger escribió:
Hello,
I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is
not
a good idea.
I think you got it the other way around. Postgres
On 18.11.2018 12:14, Martín Marqués wrote:
El 18/11/18 a las 04:49, Gerhard Wiesinger escribió:
Hello,
I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is not
a good idea.
I think you got it the other way around. Postgres implementes REDO, that
is, move forward by REDOing the
El 18/11/18 a las 04:49, Gerhard Wiesinger escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is not
> a good idea.
I think you got it the other way around. Postgres implementes REDO, that
is, move forward by REDOing the changes which are stored in WAL files
Hello,
I just read that blog article and I think switching to REDO logic is not
a good idea.
REDO has the following disadvantages, think of the following scenario:
Delete a lot of rows having 1 petabyte of data.
1.) PostgreSQL: has just do mark the rows as deleted, afterwards they
have to
