> Tom's assumption is possibly correct. If the client does not have
> autocommit set then you need to explicitly commit the transaction.
I feel a little bit stupid , I forgot the use Work.commit(); in the function
on the client side!
Thanks for the help everybody!
Tal
--
Sent from: http://ww
Hi
> On 29.08.2018, at 19:45, TalGloz wrote:
>
>
>> This is very strange, even if I comment all the loops in the function and
>> leave only the INSERT INTO command the insert still doesn't happen.
>
> Now If I execute the function locally in a query window like this:
>
> SELECT public.seal_d
> This is very strange, even if I comment all the loops in the function and
> leave only the INSERT INTO command the insert still doesn't happen.
Now If I execute the function locally in a query window like this:
SELECT public.seal_diff_benchmark_pgsql('YW55IGNhcm5hbCBwbGVhc3VyZQ==')
Then the
Tom Lane-2 wrote
> Maybe you're rolling back the transaction after leaving the function?
Why would it happen and how do I stop it if it is happening. I don't seem to
have anything in the code to cause it
Regards
Tal
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-general-f184378
> I was referring specifically to:
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/plpgsql-errors-and-messages.html#PLPGSQL-STATEMENTS-RAISE
>
> I was going for a conceptual communication, not syntax.
>
> Though if you indeed get a syntax error then that precludes the "wrong
> object" theory.
I
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:47 AM, TalGloz wrote:
>
> > Add "RAISE ERROR" to the top function's BEGIN block and verify that the
> > next time you run your calling query it indeed fails. I'm suspecting
> that
> > the code you are iterating over is not the same code that is being
> > executed
> > (s
> Add "RAISE ERROR" to the top function's BEGIN block and verify that the
> next time you run your calling query it indeed fails. I'm suspecting that
> the code you are iterating over is not the same code that is being
> executed
> (search_path dynamics probably).
Do you mean like this
BEGIN
RA
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 9:27 AM, TalGloz wrote:
> This is very strange, even if I comment all the loops in the function and
> leave only the INSERT INTO command the insert still doesn't happen.
>
Add "RAISE ERROR" to the top function's BEGIN block and verify that the
next time you run your calli
TalGloz writes:
> This is very strange, even if I comment all the loops in the function and
> leave only the INSERT INTO command the insert still doesn't happen.
Maybe you're rolling back the transaction after leaving the function?
regards, tom lane
This is very strange, even if I comment all the loops in the function and
leave only the INSERT INTO command the insert still doesn't happen.
> The sealArray creation is modified, because I don't know how the function
> public.seal_diff_benchmark is defined.
>> public.seal_diff_benchmark(tempVar1
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: TalGloz [mailto:glozman...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 29. August 2018 13:22
> To: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
> Subject: RE: Executing a Function with an INSERT INTO command fails
>
> Charles Clavadetscher wrote
> > Do
Charles Clavadetscher wrote
> Do you get any error?
The function executes perfectly and does what it's supposed to except of the
INSERT INTO part. I don't get any errors.
> Does the select deliver any result at all?
Yes, booth SELECT deliver everything they supposed to.
> If yes, is there ma
Hi
> -Original Message-
> From: TalGloz [mailto:glozman...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Mittwoch, 29. August 2018 11:12
> To: pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org
> Subject: Executing a Function with an INSERT INTO command fails
>
> Hello,
>
> I have this function that executes a C extention function in i
13 matches
Mail list logo
