Pavel,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 8:29 AM Pavel Stehule
wrote:
>
>
> po 8. 4. 2019 v 17:22 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
>
>> Pavel,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:22 PM Pavel Stehule
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> po 8. 4. 2019 v 7:57 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
>>>
David,
On Sun, Apr
Pavel,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:22 PM Pavel Stehule
wrote:
>
> po 8. 4. 2019 v 7:57 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
>
>> David,
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:11 PM David Rowley
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:57, Igal Sapir wrote:
>>> > However, I have now deleted about 50,000 rows
po 8. 4. 2019 v 17:22 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
> Pavel,
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:22 PM Pavel Stehule
> wrote:
>
>>
>> po 8. 4. 2019 v 7:57 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
>>
>>> David,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:11 PM David Rowley <
>>> david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>>>
po 8. 4. 2019 v 7:57 odesílatel Igal Sapir napsal:
> David,
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:11 PM David Rowley
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:57, Igal Sapir wrote:
>> > However, I have now deleted about 50,000 rows more and the table has
>> only 119,688 rows. The pg_relation_size() still
David,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 8:11 PM David Rowley
wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:57, Igal Sapir wrote:
> > However, I have now deleted about 50,000 rows more and the table has
> only 119,688 rows. The pg_relation_size() still shows 31MB and
> pg_total_relation_size() still shows 84GB.
> >
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:57, Igal Sapir wrote:
> However, I have now deleted about 50,000 rows more and the table has only
> 119,688 rows. The pg_relation_size() still shows 31MB and
> pg_total_relation_size() still shows 84GB.
>
> It doesn't make sense that after deleting about 30% of the
David,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 7:28 PM David Rowley
wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:19, Igal Sapir wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:20 PM David Rowley <
> david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:09, Igal Sapir wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I have a table for
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 14:19, Igal Sapir wrote:
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:20 PM David Rowley
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:09, Igal Sapir wrote:
>> >
>> > I have a table for which pg_relation_size() shows only 31MB, but
>> > pg_total_relation_size() shows a whopping 84GB.
>> >
>>
David,
On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 6:20 PM David Rowley
wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:09, Igal Sapir wrote:
> >
> > I have a table for which pg_relation_size() shows only 31MB, but
> pg_total_relation_size() shows a whopping 84GB.
> >
> > The database engine is running inside a Docker
On Mon, 8 Apr 2019 at 10:09, Igal Sapir wrote:
>
> I have a table for which pg_relation_size() shows only 31MB, but
> pg_total_relation_size() shows a whopping 84GB.
>
> The database engine is running inside a Docker container, with the data
> mounted as a volume from a partition on the host's
On 4/7/19 3:08 PM, Igal Sapir wrote:
I have a table for which pg_relation_size() shows only 31MB, but
pg_total_relation_size() shows a whopping 84GB.
What does:
pg_indexes_size()
show.
Also how many indexes are on the table?
The database engine is running inside a Docker container, with
I have a table for which pg_relation_size() shows only 31MB, but
pg_total_relation_size() shows a whopping 84GB.
The database engine is running inside a Docker container, with the data
mounted as a volume from a partition on the host's file system.
When I try to run `VACUUM FULL`, the disk usage
12 matches
Mail list logo