Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix

2019-09-25 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
På torsdag 26. september 2019 kl. 00:53:28, skrev Tom Lane mailto:t...@sss.pgh.pa.us>>: Andreas Joseph Krogh writes: > Can anybody shed som light > on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's > formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-pref

Re: lc_numeric and negative-prefix

2019-09-25 Thread Tom Lane
Andreas Joseph Krogh writes: > Can anybody shed som light > on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's > formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-prefix is > '−'(8722), > not '-'(45), at least in the JAVA-world, but it seems the JDBC-dri

lc_numeric and negative-prefix

2019-09-25 Thread Andreas Joseph Krogh
Hi. We're having this thread over at https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng/issues/420 <https://github.com/impossibl/pgjdbc-ng/issues/420> Can anybody shed som light on when negative-prefix is supposed to be respected by PG's formatting-functions? In lc_numeric='nb_NO.UTF-8' negative-