this is a very interesting case. Atul keep us posted.
Atul Kumar writes:
> Please check my findings below
> older
> -rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2 02:47
> 000136CF00A4
> -rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2 02:45
> 000136CF00A3
> -rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2
it gets cleaned up for me.
turn archiving on, simulate success using /bin/true
turn archiving off, simulate success using /bin/false
generate wals by some DMLS.
postgres@go:~/pgsql/data/pg_wal$ grep wal_size ../postgresql.conf
max_wal_size = 100MB
min_wal_size = 80MB
postgres@go:~/pgsql/data/pg_
hi Tom,
Please check my findings below
older
-rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2 02:47
000136CF00A4
-rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2 02:45
000136CF00A3
-rw--- 1 enterprisedb enterprisedb 16777216 Jun 2 02:44
000136CF000
Hi Jehan,
Just to add little more info about this issue is : We have set value
4000 for parameter wal_keep_segments.
So is there any chance that after a certain number of WAL files,
postgres will start recycling the WAL with same name ?
Please share your valuable suggestion.
Regards.
Atul
Atul Kumar writes:
> once old WAL files of pg_xlog directory are archived in
> '/nfslogs/wal/' directory then these WAL files are getting generated
> with the same name in pg_xlog directory.
Are you sure you are describing the behavior accurately?
What I would expect to happen, once an old WAL f
y is this happening ?
>>
>>
>>
>> please help me with your suggestions.
>>
>>
>> Regards.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/21, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
>> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:39:30 +0530
>> > Atul Kumar wrote:
> my query is Why is this happening ?
>
>
>
> please help me with your suggestions.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
> On 6/4/21, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:39:30 +0530
> > Atul Kumar wrote:
> >
> >> HI,
> &
my query is Why is this happening ?
please help me with your suggestions.
Regards.
On 6/4/21, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:39:30 +0530
> Atul Kumar wrote:
>
>> HI,
>>
>> We have a centos 6 enviornment where postgres 9.6 is runni
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:39:30 +0530
Atul Kumar wrote:
> HI,
>
> We have a centos 6 enviornment where postgres 9.6 is running on it.
>
> We have strange behavior of WAL files of pg_xlog directory
>
> As we have set archive_command to archive WAL files at differe
HI,
We have a centos 6 enviornment where postgres 9.6 is running on it.
We have strange behavior of WAL files of pg_xlog directory
As we have set archive_command to archive WAL files at different
location and the archive_command is working fine.
So strange behavior is :
We have a WAL file say
11 matches
Mail list logo