Okay, I had a misconception of the buffers option.
As I reread the documentation, I realized how stupid the question was.
I confirm that with the buffers option I now see:
Buffers: shared hit=9617011 read=1328356 dirtied=793 written=397, temp
read=2996659 written=5956399
Thank you both,
Matteo
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 at 21:15, Matteo Bonardi wrote:
> Explain plan: https://explain.depesz.com/s/BXGT
>
> Usually I'm looking for "external merge Disk" to see temp files usage but, in
> this case, the only reference to that is 299,368kB in the last but one node
> of explain.
> Can anyone help me
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 11:15 +0200, Matteo Bonardi wrote:
> I have a query that creates a large number of temporary files, in this
> example ~ 45GB.
> Looking at the query plan I can't figure out where temporary files are being
> generated.
>
> Explain plan: https://ex
Hi everybody,
I have a query that creates a large number of temporary files, in this
example ~ 45GB.
Looking at the query plan I can't figure out where temporary files are
being generated.
Explain plan: https://explain.depesz.com/s/BXGT
Usually I'm looking for "external merge Di
rihad writes:
> On 10/25/2019 05:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You'd need to provide a lot more detail about what that query is doing
>> for anyone to be able to guess where the temp file usage is coming from.
> I just checked and saw that the function "foo_xml_v2" above returns
> table. Is this eno
On 10/25/2019 05:49 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
rihad writes:
Hi, we frequently run many query involving XML that use a smallish
temporary file, despite having increased local work_mem in that
transaction to 16GB. FreeBSD's top shows that the memory isn't actually
being used - it remains free. Basicall
rihad writes:
> Hi, we frequently run many query involving XML that use a smallish
> temporary file, despite having increased local work_mem in that
> transaction to 16GB. FreeBSD's top shows that the memory isn't actually
> being used - it remains free. Basically many such queries are run with
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 10:23 AM rihad wrote:
> LOG: temporary file: path "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp92452.1079", size 166518
> STATEMENT: DELETE FROM "foo" WHERE ((col1, col2, col3) in (select col1,
> col2, col3 from foo_xml_v2(''))) AND
> "foo"."col_id" IN ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7, $8, $9)
Hi, we frequently run many query involving XML that use a smallish
temporary file, despite having increased local work_mem in that
transaction to 16GB. FreeBSD's top shows that the memory isn't actually
being used - it remains free. Basically many such queries are run within
a single transactio
thank you very much you take for your time
We raised the work_mem to 130 mb and there was no more problem!
Now we are seeing to improve the query, it is complicated because it is
generated by a product that we have installed in production!
--
Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/Postgre
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 01:52:41PM -0700, dangal wrote:
Hello everyone, I have a question to see if you can help me, I have set
work_mem in 100 MB but I have the following in the pgbadger
Queries generating the most temporary files (N)
Count Total size Min size Max sizeAvg size
Hello everyone, I have a question to see if you can help me, I have set
work_mem in 100 MB but I have the following in the pgbadger
Queries generating the most temporary files (N)
Count Total size Min size Max sizeAvg size
58 3.24 GiB 57.15 MiB 57.15 MiB 57.15 MiB
How could
2018-03-20 15:00 GMT+01:00 Adrian Klaver :
> On 03/20/2018 03:16 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
>
>> Thanks all for your response,
>>
>> $du -h $MY_DATA/base/$BASE_OID/ returns 162GB but when I execute this
>> query:
>>
>> |SELECT stats.relname AS table,
>> pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(statsio.rel
On 03/20/2018 03:16 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
Thanks all for your response,
$du -h $MY_DATA/base/$BASE_OID/ returns 162GB but when I execute this query:
|SELECT stats.relname AS table,
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(statsio.relid)) AS table_size,
pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(statsi
Thanks all for your response,
$du -h $MY_DATA/base/$BASE_OID/ returns 162GB but when I execute this query:
SELECT stats.relname
AS table,
pg_size_pretty(pg_relation_size(statsio.relid))
AS table_size,
pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(statsio.relid)
On 03/19/2018 10:27 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
I tried this query and my database size is equal to 162GB.
Well you can always look in $DATA directly. The database will be under
$DATA/base/.
You can find the like this:
select oid, datname from pg_database where datname='';
--
Adrian Kla
On 03/19/2018 10:29 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
That's aggregated. Not current values.
Ah did you know some documentation about that ?
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/monitoring-stats.html#PG-STAT-DATABASE-VIEW
Andreas
--
2ndQuadrant - The PostgreSQL Suppor
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Exactly how did you determine this?
> >>>
> >>> I used this command and sum result for all database :
> >>> SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('table_name'));
> >>>
>
>
>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>
>>>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>>>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all
>>>> tables, I approximately obtain 80 GB.
>>>> I also see that I
On 03/19/2018 10:17 AM, Melvin Davidson wrote:
*
*I think your problem is that SELECT
pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size('table_name')); only looks at the
current database
*
*but SELECT pg_size_pretty(pg_database_size('Database Name')); looks at
ALL databases.
Not according to he
Dear Friends,
>>>
>>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size
>of all
>>> tables, I approximately obtain 80 GB.
>>> I also see that I have 68
I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all
>> tables, I approximately obtain 80 GB.
>> I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however
>> I only
>> found 2.4MB at postgres/data/bas
drian.kla...@aklaver.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/19/2018 09:31 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>
>>>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>>>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
...@aklaver.com>>:
>>>
>>> On 03/19/2018 09:31 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Friends,
>>>
>>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all
>>>
>>
>>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
>>> approximately obtain 80 GB.
>>> I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found
>>> 2.4MB at postgres/data/base/pgs
approximately obtain 80 GB.
I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however
I only
found 2.4MB at postgres/data/base/pgsql_tmp.
Exactly how did you determine this?
I used this command and sum result for all database :
SELECT
>> Dear Friends,
>>
>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all
>> tables, I approximately obtain 80 GB.
>> I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I onl
n I check size of all
tables, I approximately obtain 80 GB.
I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only
found 2.4MB at postgres/data/base/pgsql_tmp.
Exactly how did you determine this?
I used this command and sum result for all database :
SELECT pg_si
2018-03-19 17:45 GMT+01:00 Adrian Klaver :
> On 03/19/2018 09:31 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
>
>> Dear Friends,
>>
>> I am newbie to postgresql.
>> I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
>> approximately obtain 80 GB.
>> I al
B.
>> I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found 2.4MB
>> at postgres/data/base/pgsql_tmp.
>>
>
> Exactly how did you determine this?
>
>
>> Could you tell me what are those temporary files and where are they at?
>> Can I delete some of t
> >approximately obtain 80 GB.
>
>
> Indexes?
>
> Indexes are included into 80 GB that I mentioned.
>I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found
>
> Where can you see that?
>
> I used pgAdmin 4 and I see statistics on my global database.
On 03/19/2018 09:31 AM, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am newbie to postgresql.
I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
approximately obtain 80 GB.
I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found
2.4MB at postgres/data/base/pgsql_tmp
On 19 March 2018 17:31:20 CET, Jimmy Augustine wrote:
>Dear Friends,
>
>I am newbie to postgresql.
>I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
>approximately obtain 80 GB.
Indexes?
>I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found
Dear Friends,
I am newbie to postgresql.
I have 162 GB on my database but when I check size of all tables, I
approximately obtain 80 GB.
I also see that I have 68GB of temporary files however I only found 2.4MB
at postgres/data/base/pgsql_tmp.
Could you tell me what are those temporary files and
34 matches
Mail list logo
