On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 8:01 AM Niels Jespersen wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I have som data in a resultset. E.g:
>
> id date_begin date_end amount
> 1 2021-01-04 2021-02-06 100
> 2 2021-03-17 2021-05-11 234
>
> I have a table returning function that can take one row and split it into
>
On Tuesday, June 8, 2021, Marc Millas wrote:
>
> but as this looks quite hard coded, it means that for long utf8 things
> the data length is not so long before hitting the limit.
>
> is there any plan to adress this ?
>
None that I’ve seen, and I don’t expect to see one either. Mainly because
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 9:36 AM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > We removed the pg_attrdef.adsrc catalog column a couple versions back.
> > You're evidently using quite an old version of whichever client-side
> > library is issuing this command. You need to get a
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021 at 11:55 PM Peter J. Holzer wrote:
> On 2021-06-03 22:51:55 +0200, Marc Millas wrote:
> > postgres 12 with postgis.
> > on a table we need a primary key and to get a unique combinaison, we
> need 3
> > columns of that table:
> > 1 of type integer,
> > 1 of type text,
> > 1 of
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 10:20 AM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> > Those are PostgreSQL versions...but it's your non-psql client software
> > that needs upgrading, not PostgreSQL.
>
> David,
>
> Ah! Now I understand.
>
Apparently you do not...?
David J.
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 2:26 PM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > We removed the pg_attrdef.adsrc catalog column a couple versions back.
> > You're evidently using quite an old version of whichever client-side
> > library is issuing this command. You need to get a
On Monday, June 7, 2021, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> I'm guessing qt5-5.12.8 is not recent enough to deal with the changes in
> Postgres 11+. You might want to ask this on the Qt list(s). I have tried to
> determine this, but the Qt repo structure is lets say interesting and I
> can't find any
On Saturday, June 12, 2021, Condor wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is there a way to replace select * fileds in result ?
> I have select qw.* from table but I want field for example mm to be
> replaced with custom value like:
>
> select qw.*, case whem length(qw.mm) > 0 THEN COALESCE(SUBSTRING(qw.mm,
> 1,
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021, 09:06 Hannes Kühtreiber
wrote:
> so we have to wait for psql14, or is there something else to this effect
> in an earlier release, that I failed to find?
>
By definition every feature in a vX.0 release note is new as of that
release. The sentence at the top of that
On Thursday, June 17, 2021, Gavan Schneider
wrote:
>
> My approach is to define such fields as ‘text’ and set a constraint using
> char_length(). This allows PG to do the business with the text in native
> form, and only imposes the cost of any length check when the field is
> updated… best of
On Thursday, June 17, 2021, Anand Sowmithiran wrote:
> I am looking to use the temporal tables feature for keeping track of
> changes to my table data. As of now, there is an pgxn.org provided
> extension by which we could leverage this functionality, but *when
> Temporal tables will become part
On Monday, June 21, 2021, Oliver Kohll wrote:
>
> select regexp_replace(
> 'here is [[my text]] to replace and [[some more]]',
> E'\\[\\[(.*?)\\]\\]',
> replace(E'\\1', ' ', '_'),
> 'g'
> );
>
Side note, you seldom want to use “E” (escape) string literals with regexes
(or in general really)
On Tuesday, June 15, 2021, Vijaykumar Jain
wrote:
>
>
> --- now since the lookup table is update, a noop update would get new
> shards for ids and rebalance them accordingly.
>
> test=# update t set id = id ;
> UPDATE 25
>
You probably avoid the complications by doing the above, but the amount
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, Loles wrote:
> I don't understand why the server starts that process if I'm not using
> replication of any kind.
>
>
> The server starts it with the default configuration of version 13.
>
> I think that it consumes resources that I do not need because, as I have
>
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 7:13 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Monday, May 17, 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> It looks like it won't be started if you set
> >> max_logical_replication_workers = 0.
>
> > I was wondering about th
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 6:46 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
>
> > as well as the fact that 0 disables the logical replication
> > subscribing feature altogether, and precludes the background worker
> > scheduler process from launchi
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 6:44 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> This case is the reason we invented the "stable" attribute to begin
> with. People have since misinterpreted it as authorizing caching of
> function results, but that's not what it was intended for.
>
>
This is a good paragraph...if something
On Friday, May 7, 2021, sivapostg...@yahoo.com
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> PG 11.8 in Windows 10 and currently PG 11.11
>
> Yesterday [07th May] morning when we switched on the computer and
> subsequently PGAdmin, we got the message following message
> FATAL: the database system is starting up
>
> I
On Monday, May 17, 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Sunday, May 16, 2021, Loles wrote:
> >> I don't understand why the server starts that process if I'm not using
> >> replication of any kind.
>
> > It starts the p
On Saturday, May 15, 2021, Venkata B Nagothi wrote:
>
>
> *ERROR: column c.relhaspkey does not exist at character 33*
>
> Below is the query generating the error :
>
> STATEMENT: SELECT c.relname AS table_name, c.relhaspkey AS
> has_primary_key FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c,
On Tuesday, May 18, 2021, Bryn Llewellyn wrote:
> Some time zones have abbreviations that are identical to their names. This
> query:
>
> Am I missing an essential clue to resolving what seems to me to be a
> paradox? Or am I seeing two kinds of bug?
>
>
You are missing the material in appendix
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:33 AM Pól Ua Laoínecháin wrote:
>
> I was able to do it by chaining CTEs - but I wanted to be sure that
> when chaining CTEs, all work done in a statement with multiple
> modifications to data was done within the same transaction - this is
> what I thought my SQL would
On Friday, May 14, 2021, Durumdara wrote:
>
> Is there any way to suppress the original field?
>
Remove the star and list the other columns you do want.
>
> Or say to PGSQL to skip the first XDate field?
>
> Like select t.* (EXCEPT XDate) from t
>
No, though I’ve expressed a desire for this
On Sunday, May 16, 2021, Condor wrote:
>
> new_time = fromtime * 1000; -- here is line 19
>
>
An integer times an integer results in an integer. Period. Neither
fromtime nor new_time have been assigned to yet, the in-memory result of
the computation is only allocated integer bits and if
On Saturday, May 29, 2021, Laura Smith
wrote:
>
> The problem is that my use-case calls for a scenario where due to protocol
> certain people may be designated as "VIP" and therefore need to appear at
> the top. In addition, protocol may dictate that those "VIP" people
> themselves may
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 1:02 PM Marc Millas wrote:
> about knowing if I should...
> We have to create a set of triggers (insert, update, delete) within a huge
> set of tables. and that list of tables, and structure of them can be
> customized, maintained, ...
> so we were looking for a standard
On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:22 AM Michael Lewis wrote:
> It sounds like you are wanting to run 'explain analyze [query]' inside a
> loop inside a DO block. That isn't possible as far as I know, but
> auto_explain and log_nested_statements should be able to let you profile
> the whole thing and
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021 at 2:51 PM Michael Lewis wrote:
> I am unclear exactly what you want to do with modified_date. Can you write
> pseudo code perhaps?
>
>
I second this. While I'm not all that familiar with partitioning I am
readily getting the feeling that whether or not partitioning is used
On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 11:18 AM Allan Kamau wrote:
> Is it possible to declare a UNIQUE constraint that uses GIN indexing?
>
>
Doesn't seem to be possible. The btree_gin extension would provide the
necessary code but it states explicitly that:
"... and they lack one major feature of the
Hey,
A post over in Reddit had an expression form I've never seen before:
select (array[1,2,3,4]::integer[])[generate_series(1, 3)];
===
1
2
3
Looking at subscripting in the SQL syntax this example doesn't seem to be
documented.
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 5:43 PM David Rowley wrote:
> Isn't this implied by "Each subscript is itself an expression"?
> There's nothing special here with the SRF. That just produces 3 rows
> and passes the subscript as 1, 2 then 3.
>
>
One can indeed infer that if the expression chosen for
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 6:06 PM David Rowley wrote:
> select abs(generate_series(-3,-1));
>
> abs() is simply called once per output value of the generate_series
> SRF. That seems fairly equivalent to me to what's going on in your
> example case.
>
>
Fair point. Both of these are premised on
On Monday, July 12, 2021, Tom Lane wrote:
> Still, I'm with David that no new docs
> are needed. IMO the former restriction was the surprising thing, and
> the current behavior is simply what one would expect from assembling
> those parts in that order.
>
>
I agree the material in Extending SQL
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, Wiwwo Staff wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jul 2021 at 21:42, Alban Hertroys com> wrote:
>
>> On 2021-07-08 13:30, Ron wrote:
>> > Thus, the bigTable PK must be on id, columnX, (No, I don't like it
>> > either.)
>>
>> That's not entirely true. You can keep the PK on id if you
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 12:51 PM Christopher Causer
wrote:
>
> ```
> SELECT pg_catalog.set_config('search_path', '', false);
> ```
>
The data types you are using exist in the public schema. I must assume the
associated equality operator also exists in the public schema. So, when
the
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:09 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> This isn't the only SQL syntax that has implicit operators; CASE is
> another example, and I think there are more. We've discussed inventing
> non-SQL-spec syntax that can cope with explicitly writing a qualified
> operator name in all these
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:29 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> So the problem is not lack of a server feature, it's persuading pg_dump
> to emit something other than what it does now.
>
So basically a different variation on the let someone else who feels hot
enough about it and is able to code in C figure
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:09 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> I don't think there's any good solution right now.
>
For joins it is generally easy enough to resort to the ON clause instead of
USING so of the various places there are problems this is probably the
least.
I'll admit these have been
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:09 PM Tom Lane wrote:
>
> This isn't the only SQL syntax that has implicit operators; CASE is
> another example, and I think there are more. We've discussed inventing
> non-SQL-spec syntax that can cope with explicitly writing a qualified
> operator name in all these
On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 3:39 PM Samuel Nelson
wrote:
> I've been trying to restrict permissions of some users in our system and
> noticed that `create table foo partition of bar for values from (x) to (y)`
> complains that I must be the owner of the table. Is there another GRANT I
> can give to
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:45 PM Marc Millas wrote:
> So.. I would like to understand the "why" of this behaviour, ie. the
> change of order when I do the cast.
>
I believe the "why" is immaterial here. Your queries do not contain order
by so your results are unordered - even if there appears
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021, Marc Millas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot agree.
> I did an explain analyze with and without the cast: its
> extremely different:
>
> postgres=# explain analyze with numb as(select ceiling(2582*random())::int
> rand, generate_series(1,5) as monnum) select monnum, prenom
On Mon, Mar 29, 2021 at 3:20 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> On 3/29/21 3:00 PM, Don Seiler wrote:
> >
> > I'm wondering if this is expected behavior that PG uses the
> > dts_orders.order_id value in the subquery "select order_id from
> > dts_temp" when dts_temp doesn't have its own order_id column. I
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 8:25 AM Daniel Westermann (DWE) <
daniel.westerm...@dbi-services.com> wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 08:10:08AM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> >> On 3/30/21 8:06 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> > What other software needs to upgrade through all intermediate
> versions?
>
On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 7:23 AM Glen Huang wrote:
> > I'd say that was onerous and you could get the same effect with a
> well-crafted query that targetted only those that might possibly expire.
>
> I wish one cron job could rule them all, but since a person can decide to
> join at any time, her
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 3:18 AM Brent Wood wrote:
> *From:* David G. Johnston
> *Sent:* Friday, March 12, 2021 21:19
> *To:* Brent Wood
> *Cc:* pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org <
> pgsql-general@lists.postgresql.org>
> *Subject:* Re: hstore each() function - retur
On Monday, March 15, 2021, Igor Korot wrote:
>
> [quote]
> As with PQexec, the result is normally a PGresult object whose
> contents indicate server-side success or failure. A null result
> indicates out-of-memory or inability to send the command at all. Use
> PQerrorMessage to get more
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 5:18 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Would it be better
> >> to turn the para into a bulleted list, which we could introduce with
> >> "The key d
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:28 PM Vincent Veyron wrote:
> For the record below, I wish to display 'credit' properly formated in an
> html form, using to_char(credit, 'FM999G990D00')
>
> ^
> What can I do to get a standard space as group separator for
On Wednesday, March 10, 2021, Niko Ware wrote:
>
>
> I modified the code to include the "extra" member in the following
> statement:
>
> fprintf(stderr,
> "ASYNC NOTIFY of '%s' received from backend PID %d:
> %s\n",
> notify->relname, notify->be_pid,
On Thursday, March 11, 2021, Brent Wood wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using the following in an SQL :
>
> select (EACH(value)).key as measurement_key,
>(EACH(value)).value as value
> from t_reading_hstore;
>
>
Just move the each call to the from clause as a lateral join and treat the
result as a
On Saturday, March 13, 2021, Ulrich Goebel wrote:
>
> I would like to get the rows, where a column has the default value,
> similar to:
>
> select id fromt tbl where col = default
>
If the default is a simple constant then why go through the trouble instead
of just writing col = ‘constant’ ?
On Sat, Mar 13, 2021 at 1:41 PM Ulrich Goebel wrote:
> But it could help to get a reference to the default value.
>
There is no such thing as a "default value". There is a "default
expression" though. It should be available in the system catalogs as part
of the definition of a table. But I'm
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 12:20 PM Fred Habash wrote:
> If there is a 'grant trigger' why is there not a 'grant drop trigger'?
>
>
Because creating a trigger from scratch doesn't let you affect other
triggers that you may not own (at least not directly). If drop permissions
were grantable the
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 3:21 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > The omission of the "OUT" parameter mode seems intentional since at
> present
> > our procedures do not support OUT mode parameters.
>
> Um, I just created one.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 1:57 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:41 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Guyren Howe writes:
> >>> This seems like an important consideration. I've spent 10 minutes
> >>> search
On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 4:50 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> I very strongly dislike the existing "The difference ..." wording,
> because it implies that that's the only difference, which is immediately
> belied by the rest.
Agreed!
> Would it be better
> to turn the para into a bulleted list, which we
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:49 AM Bysani, Ram wrote:
> Please provide details / clarify if Stored Procedures are available in
> versions 11.x, 12.x, 13.x Please also confirm when it was actually added.
>
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/
>
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 9:41 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Guyren Howe writes:
> > This seems like an important consideration. I’ve spent 10 minutes
> searching the documentation for PG 11 and can’t find where it is
> documented. Perhaps it should be made more prominent?
>
>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:01 PM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
> Which refers to COPYRIGHT:
>
>
> https://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=COPYRIGHT;h=655a3c59d60f54a824cc8ad6c94a4522f2b465cd;hb=HEAD
>
>
The COPYRIGHT file indeed is serving as the in-repo documentation of our
license.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 1:33 AM Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
> Yeah, this is definitely something we could work on improving. Would
> just adding a sentence after the link saying "This download is
> provided externally by EDB" (very much open to input on exactly what
> the sentence should be)? Or
On Sunday, April 11, 2021, Abraham, Danny wrote:
>
> PG Version 9.5.5 on Linux.
>
>
As neither your minor nor major version are supported you will find support
to find limited if you get any at all.
David J.
On Sunday, April 11, 2021, Ron wrote:
>
> Your comment means that the owners of any web page which links to a third
> party product must support that third-party product, just by virtue of
> supporting it. That's crazy.
>
>
We could do a better job on making it clear that the community project
On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 2:04 PM Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> I have an image on my hard drive and I'd like to store it in the BLOB
> column of the images table.
>
> Is there a simple SQL to do that in PostgreSQL?
>
>
SQL proper has no concept of "your hard drive". You need to define what
you
On Sunday, April 11, 2021, Igor Korot wrote:
> Hi, David,
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 6:24 PM David G. Johnston
> wrote:
>
> > If you can decide on what client interface you want to use there should
> be existing resources on the web walking through how to
On Sunday, April 11, 2021, David G. Johnston
wrote:
> On Sunday, April 11, 2021, Igor Korot wrote:
>
>> Hi, David,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 6:24 PM David G. Johnston
>> wrote:
>>
>> > If you can decide on what client interface yo
On Monday, February 15, 2021, Abdul Qoyyuum
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a Postgresql cluster with master and multiple slaves running on
> version 9.6. I'm trying to adjust the log_statement from all to ddl on
> specific databases (i.e. postgresql.conf has log_statement='all' but I need
> a
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:47 AM Alexander Farber <
alexander.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for any hints
>
>
json_build_array(...)
David J.
On Tuesday, February 16, 2021, Dan Nessett wrote:
> Thanks Peter. The listing of the result is from pg-admin 4.30 using
> view/edit data applied to the household_data table. In the past this has
> always returned the table contents in the ORDR BY sort order. Do I need to
> specify some
On Tuesday, February 16, 2021, Alexander Farber
wrote:
>
> But is it possible in SQL to combine all 3 queries, so that a JSONB list
> of lists is returned?
> So I have to use PL/PgSQL, correct?
>
With liberal usage of CTEs and subqueries writing a single SQL query should
be doable.
David J.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:43 PM Ron wrote:
>
> How does one go about syntax checking this?
>
> (There are 222 ALTER TABLE ADD FOREIGN KEY statements that I'm wrapping in
> similar DO blocks, and want to make sure the statements are clean.)
>
>
Begin a transaction, execute the DO, capture an
On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:28 PM Tim Cross wrote:
>
> David G. Johnston writes:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 3:43 PM Ron wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> How does one go about syntax checking this?
> >>
> >> (There are 222 ALTER TABLE ADD FORE
On Wednesday, February 17, 2021, Joao Miguel Ferreira <
joao.miguel.c.ferre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We are using Pg 11.
>
> Example:
> a = [ x, y ]
> b = [ z , w ]
> result would be [ x, y, z, w ]
>
> What would you consider to be a suitable approach ?
>
That’s called concatenation.
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 9:19 AM Marc Millas wrote:
>
> postgres=# prepare moninsert(varchar) as
>
> do $$ begin for counter in 1..100 loop execute
> moninsert(randname());end loop;end;$$;
> ERREUR: la fonction moninsert(character varying) n'existe pas
> someone can explain ?
>
>
>From the
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:46 AM Alexander Farber <
alexander.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then I have to split the query in 3 similar ones (with same condition)?
>
> I try:
>
> SELECT
> JSONB_AGG(TO_CHAR(finished, '-MM-DD')) AS day
> FROM words_games
> WHERE
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 12:34 PM Alexander Farber <
alexander.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah, thank you...
>
> JSON support in PostgreSQL is cool and seems to be extended with each
> release.
>
> But standard tasks of returning a JSON map of lists or JSON list of list
> seem to be difficult to
On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:39 AM Alexander Farber <
alexander.far...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Or is the syntax error about being able to use JSONB_AGG only once per
> SELECT query?
>
>
That.
David J.
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 4:38 PM Guyren Howe wrote:
> The documentation says that inet_server_addr() does this, but on our
> servers it is returning nothing.
>
"Returns the IP address on which the server accepted the current
connection, or NULL if the current connection is via a Unix-domain
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 5:07 PM Steve Baldwin
wrote:
> My 'dilemma' is that this functionality is packaged and the database it is
> bundled into could be running on a pre-12 version or 12+. Is there any way
> I can rewrite my view to achieve the same outcome (i.e. only creating 0 or
> 1 advisory
On Thursday, February 11, 2021, Steve Baldwin
wrote:
> Try ... EXECUTE PROCEDURE customer_num_informix()
>
FUNCTION, not PROCEDURE
David J.
On Thursday, February 11, 2021, Steve Baldwin
wrote:
> David, from what I can see of the docs, for 9.6 it is PROCEDURE. It seems
> FUNCTION didn't appear until 11.
>
Indeed. I didn’t pay attention to the version.
David J.
On Monday, February 22, 2021, Alexander Farber
wrote:
>
>
> but how to get a JSON map of lists here? I am trying:
>
> {
>"day": [ "2021-02-08", "2021-02-09", ... ],
>"completed": [ 475, 770, ...],
>"expired": [ 155, 263 , ...]
> }
>
If you want the days aggregated then don’t “group
On Monday, February 22, 2021, Lorenzzo Egydio Mollinar da Cruz <
loren...@iftm.edu.br> wrote:
> I need to migrate a database from postgresql 9 to postgresql 12, as I will
> update the version of my MOODLE and the current version does not support
> postgres 9, is there any procedure for me to
On Monday, February 22, 2021, Oleksandr Voytsekhovskyy wrote:
> What is the right way to pass long INT values list to IN filter
>
Don’t.
Pass in a delimited string, then parse that string into an array and use “=
any(array)”.
This has the primary benefit of making the input a single
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:34 PM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> group by p.person_nbr, c.contact_date
>
I thought you said (p.person_nbr, c.contact_date) is already unique?
David J.
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:52 PM Rich Shepard
wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2021, David G. Johnston wrote:
>
> > I thought you said (p.person_nbr, c.contact_date) is already unique?
>
> Yes, that's the PK for the contacts table. I'm still unsure what needs to
> be
> explic
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 7:34 PM A Z wrote:
> The library that I have been using so far is ttmath, in GNU C++. That
> library
> is High Precision, in the end, and does seem to be high precision enough,
> accurate enough and fast enough for my programs.
>
I'm guessing from the silence, and my
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:29 AM Edu Gargiulo wrote:
>
> I need to transpose and return one row for a single timestamp and one
> column for every name (fixed number of names), something like this
>
>
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/tablefunc.html
or
select ..., max(value) filter (where
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:17 AM Adrian Klaver
wrote:
>
> To me the issue is that the extension was modified to trusted by an end
> user not the extension author. I gotta believe there is more to the
> trusted then a flag in the control file. It would not be surprising to
> me that an ad hoc
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 6:26 AM Tom Lane wrote:
> "Li EF Zhang" writes:
> > Since pg13 support trusted extension, so I changed control file of bloom
> and make it trusted.
>
> The fact that you can edit the file that way doesn't make it a supported
> case.
>
>
Why does that matter here though?
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 1:09 PM Mladen Gogala
wrote:
> Why do you think that the normal user should be allowed to drop
> extensions?
The documentation.
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/sql-createextension.html
"This configuration gives the calling user the right to drop the extension,
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 2:59 PM ourdiaspora
wrote:
> Please what is the syntax to assign an unknown file name to the 'fopen'
> function?
>
>
There isn't one as it would make no sense - how is it supposed to open a
file if there is no filename provided to open?
You have to set things up yourself
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:08 AM FOUTE K. Jaurès
wrote:
> Any idea how to solve this issue is really appreciated
>
Have you restarted the server?
In pg_attribute for one of the problematic tables are all of the columns
present that should be (i.e., is this a catalog contents error or, say, a
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:29 AM FOUTE K. Jaurès
wrote:
> I already restart the server (x3)
>
>
Ok. During server startup (or shutdown for that matter) are there any
warnings or errors in the log file? Is there anything in the server logs
from around the time this started to occur?
You haven't
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 9:20 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:51 PM Li EF Zhang wrote:
> >> Thanks for your answer. My doubt is that since an ordinary user creates
> >> the extension, shouldn't be this
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:51 PM Li EF Zhang wrote:
> Thanks for your answer. My doubt is that since an ordinary user creates
> the extension, shouldn't be this user the owner of the objects created
> within the extension?
>
While that is a possible implementation choice, that isn't what was
On Wednesday, August 25, 2021, Christophe Pettus wrote:
>
> lower() and unaccent() (and most string functions) are not marked as
> leakproof. Is this due to possible locale / character encoding errors they
> might encounter?
>
>
I think you are partially correct. Its due to the fact that error
On Saturday, August 28, 2021, Trang Le wrote:
>
> after running script
>
>
How?
>
> I check this script in pg_lock, everything ok, job
> done, data is inserted.
>
>
You can tell this from pg_lock?
>
>
> However, the session
>
>
Where is this session?
David J.
On Sunday, August 29, 2021, Ray O'Donnell wrote:
>
>>>
>> Is there an alternative scenario, such as the user is able to create
>> a new table with saves the session data for a maximum time (such as
>> 24 hours), even up to a certain time if the web browser crashes for
>> example?
>
>
In general
On Sunday, August 29, 2021, ourdiaspora wrote:
>
>
> Yes, wanted to know relevant parts because often the first problem is to
> know which part of the (extensive) documentation to read...
>
>
Suggest you just start developing. When you get stuck the nature of the
block should inform where to go
701 - 800 of 1572 matches
Mail list logo
