I took some time last night to go to DejaNews (www.dejanews.com), and do
a search for PostgreSQL, ordered by date. I looked at Usenet posting
from the past two weeks that mention PostgreSQL.
I did this about a year ago, and was disappointed in what I saw. There
were not many postings that menti
We are trying to upgrade our present Postgres 6.3.2 database running on
Linux/i386 to v6.4.2 on Sun Solaris 2.5.1.
I tried to compile the server using GCC for Solris 2.5.1. Everything
went well except while running the regression tests, which failed giving
these messages:
+ ERROR: Load of file
/b
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, David Giffin wrote:
# I was wondering if there was a way to get pg_dump to dump the rights for
# the tables? I know that pg_dumpall seems to do it. But I only want to
# dump one database not the whole server.
verde:~ 104> pg_dump -h
pg_dump: ERROR: Option requires an argumen
Hello,
I was wondering if there was a way to get pg_dump to dump the rights for
the tables? I know that pg_dumpall seems to do it. But I only want to
dump one database not the whole server.
Thanks,
David
I'm installing v6.4.2 on Solaris 2.5.1. Everything goes well until I run
the regression test. Some of the test fails with an error message like:
+ ERROR: Load of file
/bytek/postgres/postgresql-6.4.2/src/test/regress/input/.
./regress.so failed: ld.so.1: /bytek/postgres/bin/postmaster: fatal:
rel
Forgive me if I send this to the wrong address; this is my first post to
this
list.
I have looked at previous posts regarding backup. All that I have seen
say
to use pg_dump during time of inactivity. However, on a business web
server
that is active 24/7, will it still be stable? I have test
>I tried to place a query like "SELECT * FROM x WHERE a = b || c" where
> a, b and c are text columns in table x.
> Unfortunately all I get are Syntax Errors pointing to the
concatenation
> operator. This happens under 6.3. with psql and jdbc.
> Am I just tripping over a bug or do have to use some
> >There is no patch for this...we've tried in the past to create "clean"
> >patches, and each time so problem arose from it...
> >
> >In the case of v6.4.1 -> v6.4.2, its even worse, since the reason that
> >v6.4.2 was released was because v6.4.1 was a mis-package...I erroneously
> >packaged up o
>There is no patch for this...we've tried in the past to create "clean"
>patches, and each time so problem arose from it...
>
>In the case of v6.4.1 -> v6.4.2, its even worse, since the reason that
>v6.4.2 was released was because v6.4.1 was a mis-package...I erroneously
>packaged up our -CURRENT
On Wed, 6 Jan 1999, Silvio Emanuel Barbosa de Macedo wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Where can I find the required patch to upgrade 6.4.1 to 6.4.2 ?
There is no patch for this...we've tried in the past to create "clean"
patches, and each time so problem arose from it...
In the case of v6.4.1 -> v6.4.2, it
Hi!
Where can I find the required patch to upgrade 6.4.1 to 6.4.2 ?
I am reluctant to download 5.x Mb each time a minor update is released.
(6.4, 6.4.1, an now 6.4.2 = 17Mb!)
Please note that I've already check psql-patches mailing list archives...
Is /pub/patches supposed to be almost empty
11 matches
Mail list logo