On Fri, 19 Feb 1999, Jackson, DeJuan wrote:
> The only suggestion I have is to do the Sort after you get the data
> back, Perl's pretty good at that.
>
> Let me know what the timings are. I went to the site and it looks like
> it only take ~3-5 seconds to get the data to my browser and format
The only suggestion I have is to do the Sort after you get the data
back, Perl's pretty good at that.
Let me know what the timings are. I went to the site and it looks like
it only take ~3-5 seconds to get the data to my browser and format it.
-DEJ
> -Original Message-
> I di
> Actually, it's just text. Here's a sample record:
>
> 10003 43140280 B Smallwood Road A31 13131891899301893018 9501 9501 227
> 222 -82521645+33638976 -82528956+33639940
>
> ...the CD-ROM "database" is about 600MB.
i never looked at the tiger that was that old, but i know that the new
ones f
On Thu, 18 Feb 1999, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > If the TIGER/Line data is raster, and each feature (polygon, line,
> > circle, etc) doesn't exceed the block size, then postgresql should be able
> > to handle it.
> [snip]
>
> Vector not rast
I've heard that you can recompile POSTGRES to allow larger than 8K
records (tuples). I've looked everywhere and I haven't been able to
find any information on it..
Anyone know how to do this or where I should look ?
Thanks in advance..
C'ya,
Edmund
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On Wed, 17 Feb 1999, Peter T Mount wrote:
>
> [snip]
> > If the TIGER/Line data is raster, and each feature (polygon, line,
> > circle, etc) doesn't exceed the block size, then postgresql should be able
> > to handle it.
> [snip]
>
> Vector not raster. Right?
Actually, it's just text. He
Rodney McDuff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've compiled postgresql 6.3.2 with kerberos 4 support (using
> the KTH-KRB Ebones distribution) on a Alpha running DU4.0D.
I've been using KTH Kerberos IV with PostgreSQL for a long time, and
it's always been working great, until very recently (
