Other people have said a lot on this, but IMHO missed some key points
Boris wrote:
>
> Hello pgsql-general,
>
> i need to calculate the memory requirement if i am using apache+pgsql.
>
> Lets assume that i want 160.000 hits a day and pgsql takes 3 seconds
> to work for each client, how much ra
Patrick Raphael wrote:
>
>I figured out the problem, postmaster when run as postgres didn't have
>write permissions to /var/run/postgresql directory (where the Debian
>version puts its socket files) and therefore didn't have permission to
>open the socket. .
What Debian version of post
JG> I don't see Solaris 8 on the list of supported platforms,
I have compiled postgres 7.0.3 on SPARC/Solrais 8. But it was compiled w/o tcl
support. There is no
much time since installation, but yet all works fine.
JG> but Solaris 7 is
JG> there, so I had hoped 8 would work pretty much the
Fernando Schapachnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> select * from aliases where alias~'^claudia.gonzalez$' \g
> alias|receptores
> -+--
> (0 rows)
> select * from aliases where alias~'claudia.gonzalez$' \g
> alias |receptores
> +--
> claudia.gonzal
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tim Barnard writes:
>> The program '/usr/local/pgsql/bin/postgres' needed by initdb does not
>> belong to PostgreSQL version 7.1beta4. Check your installation.
> Can you run 'sh -x initdb ...' and show me the output? Some platform
> information woul
Patrick Raphael <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I figured out the problem, postmaster when run as postgres didn't have
> write permissions to /var/run/postgresql directory (where the Debian
> version puts its socket files) and therefore didn't have permission to
> open the socket. .
ROTFL ... score
On Sun, 4 Feb 2001, Boris wrote:
> That sounds good, the only question left is the memory requiremend of
> apache per client, i do not completely understand the spawning things
> with Apache. On high load there are alway minimum 10 processes left,
> but where is the limit? Interesting thing.
I wo
At 06:13 PM 04-02-2001 +0100, Boris wrote:
>LY> My guess is that your hits are likely to bunch up at certain times,
rather
>LY> than be spread out evenly (90% of the people behave similarly 90% of the
>LY> time). So you might wish to multiply by 5 or 10 (or whatever you pluck
from
>LY> the air ;)
